38. Standing Up

This Standing Up Page is intended to illustrate to the Politician, and the citizen who may contact their Politician, that it is important to stand up for those who can not stand up for themselves when the bullies start bullying. I suppose we will find out which Politicians have the intestinal fortitude to stand up for a Grantor and Beneficiary, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights because they will be in support of that and their names will end up on the #12. Honor Roll Page of this website.

Standing up for that which is right and standing against that which is wrong, how many do that and why?

In 1992, I was a construction superintendent driving south of Dallas on my way to a job in Pasadena (suburb of Houston) and I had transmission problems with a company truck at about 6:00 A.M. The truck was still barely drivable and I took an exit and drove a few miles west to a small town and parked in front of a transmission shop to await its opening. When the shop opened they took the truck in can started to make the repairs and I sat and waited on a bench in front of the shop. There were some local men sitting on the benches in front of this transmission shop and there were a group of 5 or 6  black school children that had come to wait on the sidewalk for the school bus and they were about 75 feet to our right.

These children who were grade school children, were orderly and very neatly dressed and it was obvious their parents (probably their moms) prepared them well for school as pertaining to being clean was dressed in nice clean clothes.

Then one of these males (for a man does not do this) stood up, walked about 25 feet to our right and in a stooping stance, with a know it all type of a frown, stated, “You can not convince me they are not direct decedents of apes!” I could tell the children heard that and they were being polite and quiet about it.

Then I stood, walked over to this “male” and said in a loud enough voice so the children could hear, which everyone on the benches could hear too, “I bet you are right!!! No one ever could convince you!!!” This male went back to the bench and shut his trap up.

I was in a strange town, among strangers, with no transportation available at that minute, with no one that I could see that would jump in on my side in case a fight broke out, when I stood up for a group of black children who were minding their own business, when a loud mouth bigot ran his mouth in an obvious abusive way. Of all of the people who will visit this apowtwice website which one of you would have done the same thing as I did?

What I did in reference to my actions pertaining to my Dad’s Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust is no different then when I stood up as what was just plain the right thing to do pertaining to a bigot who ran his mouth, speaking through his ass, when he intentionally abused defenseless black school children who were minding their own business.

These lawyers and Trustees purposely abused my defenseless Dad, running their speech through their asses as can be plainly proven in the language of the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust, and in this case when I stood up to them they fought back like stubborn Missouri Mules as Selfish, Malicious, Predator, Blood Sucker, Bottom Feeder, Cold Blooded, Parasite, Shyster Lawyers instead of shutting their traps and sitting down. The guy in Texas actually had more sense then these Trustees and Lawyers and knew to shut up when he was obviously wrong.

What is really amazing is the Probate Court Judge ruled in favor for these hypocrite Lawyers and Trustees similar to the Supreme Court’s historically flawed decision(s) that

Negro slaves were not human on the same level as white people

and should not be given any considerations above that of an animal of labor like a horse or an oxen.

Dred Scott vs Stanford: 

“In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks — slaves as well as free — were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country’s territories.

‘The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom.

‘Taney — a staunch supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression — wrote in the Court’s majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, he wrote, believed that blacks “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever profit could be made by it.”

‘Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, “all men are created equal,” Taney reasoned that “it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . .”

‘Abolitionists were incensed. Although disappointed, Frederick Douglass, found a bright side to the decision and announced, “my hopes were never brighter than now.” For Douglass, the decision would bring slavery to the attention of the nation and was a step toward slavery’s ultimate destruction.”

I suppose in like manner the Probate Court Judgment will serve to help end the Lawyer, Trustee, and “den of thieves” Law Firm abuses against innocent Grantors and innocent Beneficiaries, because the Probate Court Judgment is of the same Spirit of neglect for the innocent as was the Supreme Court Decision of Dred Scott, and I think it is clear this is true for anyone with eyes to see for themselves.

The way I read the Probate Court Judgment it seems that a dead man has no rights retroactive to when he was alive similar to what the Stupid Supreme Court Decision claimed that “it is too clear for dispute,” “that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.” It would seem that in like manner the Probate Court Judgment ruled that a dead man has no rights and it is too clear for dispute that the Lawyers and Trustees have an absolute Right to go against the written wills, desires, and instructions of a Grantor of a family Will and Trust “for his [own] benefit!”

Is this not absurd!!!

Furthermore, according to the Probate Court Judgment, my Dad had no rights when the lawyers and Trustees tricked him into signing his Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust because when this was clearly and plainly presented to the “Honorable Court” with

the Will and Trust as written proof of the obvious embedded abuses,

the Judgment stated that this all was, “not supported by the evidence, not credible and are without legal basis or authority.” This is NOT me being contemptuous against the “Honorable Court,” but it is the “Honorable Court’s” own Judgment that is the Honorable Court’s own written actions that are in contempt with the same “Honorable Court” as can be plainly observed and seen by anyone who has eyes to see, that something is not right with what the Lawyers and Trustees did to my Dad, and how the “honorable Court” ruled in its written Judgment, for all to plainly see, makes no sense at all.

So IF the Probate Court had to follow the Probate Laws (or any other laws) to achieve the Judgment that seems in contempt with the court itself,

and for sure in contempt of my Dad,

and myself, who obviously relied on the plain English grammar used in the Will and Trust to make our decisions on; then is this NOT obvious and present proof positive that there is an urgent and necessary need for a

Grantor and Beneficiary, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights

and fast, the sooner the better!

Again, stand up for that which is right and standing against that which is wrong. How many do that and why? My “why” is that it is the right thing to do and someday I will have to make an accounting to God and my Dad, and one thing that my Dad will ask me (and the Lawyers and Trustees too) is,

“What did you do with our family name?”

What have these Lawyers and Trustees done with the “Kelley” name and especially to the Patriarch of the Kelley Family, my Dad, Dale Kelley?

Bro. Jim

This following article about my Dad was originally on the Home Page and when the Home Page got to crowed I created weeds pages and this can be found on the Weed One Page about 1/5 of the way down I think.

My Dad standing up and manning up for a good black man who needed some help in about 1963:

When I grew up in the 1950s all of my buddies’ Dads were WW II veterans because that was the norm. Everyone seemed to respect the Stars and Stripes a lot more then and also respected other’s unalienable Rights back then too, except there was a whole lot of racism then, and my Dad fought against racism tooth and nail sometimes at risk to himself, he was that kind of guy.

One Sunday morning our family was driving to Church and there was a foot of fresh snow on the roads, and on the shoulder on top of an already established snow pack, and as we were driving to Church we observed a black man struggling to walk in the snow, on the shoulder, of Portage Highway. We went on to Church which was perhaps another two miles north down the road, the women folk got out so now we had room for another passenger, and my Dad and I went back to where the black man was and gave him a ride for about two miles or so, to the west, to where he worked as a janitor at the South Bend Airport. His car wouldn’t start, because it was old and he did not make much as a janitor in 1963, and he was trying his best, walking in a foot of fresh snow on top of an uneven established snow pack the snow plows left behind days earlier, just to get to work on time, and because my Dad went out of his way, to go back and give this guy a ride, he was on time for work. Good job Dad!

To bad the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm, didn’t go out of their way to give my Dad his casket that he “desired,” wanted, willed and paid for, instead of going out of their ways to do a Screw You Father, Revenge Cremation Insult and continue to this very day to go out of their ways to justify the unjustifiable, which is to continually defend cremating a goodly parent and goodly man when that goodly parent and goodly man asked for, and paid for, a casket funeral and a casket burial. No wonder the Missouri Attorney General was outraged and I do hope and pray all goodly people will be just as outraged and help do something about it!

In case someone may not remember if old enough, or would be to young to know, before the era of Civil Rights being passed and accepted more socially in the late 1960s, it was often at great personal risk and hazard that a white person would help a black person should the wrong white bigots see the good deeds of helping a black person. White bigots despised black people, and hated any white person who would befriend or help a black person, and often they got away with their abuses of black people as well as their abuses of white people who would dare to be friendly with a black person. That is just the way it was back then and any white person, with any sense at all, knew they were taking a chance when they helped a black person in any way, shape or form.

Kind of like me, the #1 Son, stood up against my sisters, and brother-in-laws, two of which were lawyers in a Gang of four lawyer “bigots” in opposition and proven “opponents” to my veteran Dad, I knew I was taking a chance standing up for my Dad and the proof is I have taken a lot of abuses, even losing $18,000 Inheritance out of my own pocket, for my stand for “Truth, Justice, and the American Way,” for my own Dad, proving I am a chip off of the old block.

Good job raising me Dad!

I just looked up the definition of “bigot” and I am surprised racism is not included in the year 2000 edition of Random House Webster’s College Dictionary. The definition is: a person who is extremely intolerant of another’s creed, belief, or opinion.

It would seem a more modern definition of “bigot” now has lost the specific eliminate of “racism” when it clearly included racism specifically in the past as general usage. Never the less, the dictionary definition of today suits perfectly the “extremely intolerant” actions of the Trustees/lawyers for my “creed, belief, or opinion” that my Dad should never have been “captured” against his will, subjected to an Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust, and suffered an ending Screw You Father, Revenge Cremation Insult instead of getting his  instructed “desire” and will to be buried in a casket with a grave monument which he paid for in advance.

Here is a more recent story about my Dad standing up against the KKK. The KKK had a march in Hermitage, Mo., about 1985, or so, and my Dad went there, went into the street where they were parading and told each KKK member that they were wrong and God would judge them severely for being a racist against an innocent group of people. Yep, I guess I am a chip off the Old Block. Thank you Dad for teaching me correct principles according to the Bill of Rights supported by the Gospel of Jesus Christ.


So if my Dad, myself, and the Blues Brothers can stand up against Nazis then WHY CAN’T YOU???



This website is political speech for the purpose to convince enough politicians who are in the Missouri State Legislator to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. By necessity this political speech has to be straight forward, containing the raw truth, to raise the awareness of the State Legislators for the real and desperate need of this Bill of Rights to protect the innocent Grantors and Beneficiaries from the evil designs of unethical shyster lawyers. This is a Human Rights matter and I would think it should receive bipartisan support; I pray so, I hope so.

This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.

What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious  self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.

As always if the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.