This is another Chapter in the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia “Secret Combinations” Secret Society Shadow Governments (as predicted by the Ancient American Indian Scriptures).
THE TRUTH NO LONG MATTERS IN THE AMERICAN COURT SYSTEMS
How can anyone trust the American Court Systems when right in your face PROOF like this is presented that THE TRUTH DOESN’T MATTER anymore in the American Court Room making our American Court Systems just like the SNL Court Room skits that were created as a joke. OUR AMERICAN COURT ROOMS HAVE EVOLVED INTO A NOT SO FUNNY JOKE!!!
QUESTION FOR THIS JUDGE: Commissioner Carol T. Aiken, was it worth it this time (obviously this is NOT the first time) to give your fellow American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia members your obvious, and open in the People’s face, FAVORS to them in your SNL Court Room farce with your; you must have fallen down a rabbit hole, Twilight Zone, Alice’s Wonderland, Judgment, that defies all Truth, Justice, Liberty, and all that is the American Way? You can give me your answer at firstname.lastname@example.org, if you have the guts to even give an answer without the protections of the Bench!
Note: A transcript of the Throw In The Towel Letter is about 1/2 way down this Page.
This Throw In Towel Page is intended to illustrate to the Politician, and the citizen who may contact their Politician, that the lawyer profession can be more brutal than any boxing match ever could be because organized boxing has the Throw In The Towel Rule that when the towel is thrown in that is the end of the fight, the referee protects the boxer the towel was thrown for, and does everything in the referee’s power to alert the opponent boxer there was a towel thrown in and the fight is finished, no ifs, no ands, and no buts, no more strikes, no more blows, no more jabs, nothing any more except compassion for the honorable opponent that has surrendered. THAT IS SPORTSMANSHIP!!!
Since the Probate Court Judge is, or seems, unable to act as ethically as a boxing referee when a Throw In The Towel Letter is offered, then this is as much evidence as anything else of the need for a Grantor and Beneficiary, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, to give the Power and Authority to a Probate Judge to act at least as ethically as a boxing referee.
In professional and amateur boxing when a side “throws in the towel” that means the end of the fight, no more punches, no more advances, fight finished, no ifs, no ands, no buts, and there is no ignoring or taking back a “throw in the towel!” As the photo plainly shows the superior boxer is looking at the towel knowing this is the end of this fight and if he were to even try to continue the fight somehow he would lose the fight by default then, even though he has won by surrender, and most probably he would be banned from any organized boxing for the rest of his life; that is how reprehensible a violation of “throwing in the towel” is, a boxer just doesn’t do that and still maintain any kind of honorable status in organized boxing.
Also, as demonstrated by this photo, the Referee will place their body between the boxers after the “throw in the towel” as an added signal and insurance that both boxers will know that there is a halt to the fight. In this way both boxers are without excuse to know there is a halt in the fight and this gives both boxers an opportunity during the halt to learn about the “throw in the towel,” if they did not know already. This is a safety proceedure so the game can be played safer because boxing is not about hate, it is about skill and execution of that skill with strength and endurance. Notice the referee puts his own body in harms way to protect the boxer that the throw in the towel was for.
In my mind’s eye, when I look at this picture I see the white shorts as the Trustees and Law Firm, myself as the dark shorts, and the referee as the Judge who in my opinion should have shrouded me with protections because of my Throw In The Towel Letter from any harm that resulted after my Throw In The Towel Letter, placing herself between me and the lawyers as a fair and honest protector of the innocent and poor of Society.
Many consider boxing a barbaric sport but apparently boxing is a superior civilized sport then the lawyer profession is by actual comparison. If a judge can not, will not, protect an innocent defendant, from ravaging wolves lawyers like in this case, when the defendant wrote a Throw In The Towel Letter months in advance, how civilized is the probate Court system and does this not prove beyond any shadow of a doubt the urgent need of a Grantor and Beneficiary, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights? In my opinion a Bill of Rights like this is the best fix for a system that does not protect the innocent and poor pertaining to family Wills and Trusts.
My Throw In The Towel Letter was dated, and sent by e-mail as well as USPS, December 28, 2017.
There were two (2) Probate Court Cases and two (2) Depositions well after this letter was sent and received. When this Throw In The Towel Letter was not honored by the Law Firm and Trustees that is NOT my fault, that is the fault of the Law Firm and Trustees. If this were organized boxing they would be banned for life and perhaps the Missouri BAR O.C.D.C. will disbar them for life.
May the visitor of this website read for yourself my Throw In The Towel Letter and determine for yourself if I, Jim Kelley, should be assigned some $18,000 of “legal fees” that occurred after this Throw In The Towel Letter was thrown in the ring? The Probate Court Judge asked Carl, Carl acting as a defense lawyer for the Trustee Nancy, “Are you sure you want to do this?” towards the end of the 2nd Probate Court Hearing when he petitioned the Court to assign all of the “legal fees” of the rich Beneficiaries to the one poor Beneficiary, myself. Carl stated that he absolutely did and apparently Carl presented some kind of a flawed Case Law where the Judge had to assign the excessive and unnecessary “legal fees” to me and I was not able to defend myself on this by my not being able to research Case Law, etc., or afford to hire this done for myself.
Here is the time line after my Throw In The Towel Letter:
December 28, 2017, Throw In The Towel Letter.
January 12, 2017, received Nancy’s infamous BRIBE that if I signed away all of my unalienable Rights she would drop the law suit and wind up the Trust as soon as possible so I would get some money. 15 days after my Throw In The Towel Letter. (See # 177. Nancy’s BRIBE)
Note: I will create a website page named “BRIBE” to show and explain Nancy’s Infamous BRIBE and how no one in their right mind would have signed Nancy’s Infamous BRIBE, the same as no one in their right mind would have signed my Dad’s Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust if they could have seen what they were signing (my Dad was virtually blind) and/or would have not been lied to by those who could see what was written at the time of signing.
January 17, 2018, 1st Probate Court Hearing. 21 days after the Throw In The Towel Letter.
March 16, 2018, 1st Deposition. 2 ½ months after the Throw In The Towel Letter.
March 31, 2018, 2nd Deposition. 3 months after the Throw In The Towel Letter.
April 4, 2018, 2nd Probate Court Hearing. 3 months and 1 week after the Throw In The Towel Letter.
Note: This apowtwice.com website came after my Throw In The Towel Letter as something necessary, according to revelations I received from God to start this website, to protect myself from the S.M.P.B.S.B.F.S.L.s, and judging from all that has happened since my Throw In The Towel Letter, this website has been a God Send, and blessing for me and for the righteous cause of a Mission to petition the Legislators to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. I shutter to think what my life would be like if I did not have this website, and revelations from God most every step of the way, to help keep the lawyers at bay to some extent now. Actually the Throw In The Towel Letter was written by revelations from God. I am not smart enough to write such a letter as that by myself especially not knowing ahead of time what this Gang of Lawyers are capable of doing and will do in the future.
Again, compare my Throw In The Towel Letter, with the time line above, and you make up your own mind, you be the judge, if it is even close to anything ethical for myself, Jim Kelley, to have to pay the rich Beneficiaries and Trustees’ “legal fees” that I did not contract for, I did not sign for, I did not initiate, I did not ask for, but I actually tried my best to keep from happening and keep the tab from being run up excessively?
Also my Throw In The Towel Letter was presented in the Probate Court as my Exhibit E, as I explained it to the Judge in Court; so I did my due diligence to present this to the Court. Why the Court did not honor this Letter for what it clearly represents I do not know but apparently this Letter was found by the Judge as “not supported by the evidence, not credible and are without legal basis or authority,” and that is a direct quote from the Judge from their written Judgment pertaining to all of “the exhibits, considering the testimony and evidence presented.”
I am not anxious to even seem to be in contempt of the Honorable Court by giving any commentary on the actual written Judgment so I will leave any questionings to the visitor’s own discretion, own mind and own prudence. What I am presenting here is only an actual Exhibit E presented in the Court and actual quotes from the Judgment.
Pertaining to Carl’s petition that I pay for the “opponents” to the Grantor, the Trustees and Law Firm, consider this; “For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.” 1 Timothy 6:10, compare verses 5-12.
———————Throw In The Towel Letter below———————-
December 28, 2017
Greene County Probate Court Case No. 1731-PR01048
Subject: Throw in the towel to wind up Trust.
Reference: Needed Truth in Wills and Trusts Act/Legislation.
To all those who this applies, including Mr. Sherman, greetings,
I will throw in the towel, withdraw all of my objections and demands, if the Trustees and the Law Firm withdraw all of their court actions and go ahead with the final distributions of the Will and Trust. I further require for my towel to be thrown in that I am not harmed by a punitive burden to pay for attorney fees, etc. myself, because my actions were honest, fair, prudent and according to the language of the Will and Trust.
After talking with three lawyers about this case, the last lawyer I talked to just yesterday, suggested the Court would consider the other beneficiaries losing their inheritance for their Cremation Insult to be excessive. This lawyer did not think my jurisprudence of enacting the No Contest provision for violating the Will provision to be buried in a casket would muster my desired court action, so apparently, so much for the actual language of the Will and Trust.
Apparently the real problem, the real battle, is not in the courts now, but in the Federal and State Legislatures to enact some kind of needed Truth in Wills and Trusts Legislation so the Grantors of Wills and Trusts can be secure in their papers and persons as to what they spell out in their Wills and Trusts will be carried out.
Apparently what has happened with my Dad’s Will and Trust is legalized lying and stealing to achieve the vindictive and evil desires of a few in power. These lies and thefts have been mentioned before so there is no reason to mention them here but to say; truth is truth, time is on the side of truth, and truth is its own defense during mortality and the eternities.
For anyone that may think my Dad would be satisfied with his casket being stolen from him let me reference this occasion of my Dad’s own claim “this is not the kind of justice I fought for in WW II.”
In 1967, my Dad purchased a donut business in Lee’s Summit, Mo. My Dad hired a local lawyer, Hollis Hartley, to draw up the contract to purchase a business. The actual purchase was for the equipment only because the name was changed from Paradise Donuts to Kelley’s Donuts, all new business licensing was acquired including a new Sales Tax number, and the small building was a rented building with a new agreement in place for the rent for the new business.
After a few months of doing business a bureaucrat[s] sent letters to the Kelley’s Donut Shop for back Sales Taxes owed by the out of business Paradise Donut Shop. In those days the Sales Tax was a straight 3% on everything. The unwarranted bill was about $100 and many business people would have just paid it as a nuisance not worth the trouble to fight. Not Dad, he wrote a letter in protest saying he did not owe the money. That went back and forth a few times with the bureaucrats and then my Dad wrote a letter to the Governor explaining, “This is not the kind of justice I fought for in WW II.” The Governor agreed and that was the end of the mindless, gerbil, bureaucrat harassment.
My point is my Dad felt that he fought for justice for all, including himself, and he was ready, willing, and able to announce that should the occasion arise. Obviously my Dad being robbed in all the ways he was robbed, with and through his Will and Trust, would cause my Dad to declare “this is not the kind of justice I fought for in WW II ,” because there are several examples of injustice with my Dad’s Will and Trust, and that is pretty self-evident. If my Dad had a grave to roll over in he would be rolling over in his grave now.
My desire now is to take the battle to the Legislators, using my Dad’s Will and Trust as a textbook example as to what is wrong, to fix the laws so when a Grantor says they want to be buried in a casket, and puts up their own money to pay for a casket, they are buried in a casket, “period!,” as my dear old Dad would say when he wanted to emphasize something.
Obviously the Law Firm and the Plaintiff/Trustee have the power and authority to withdraw all of their petitions, motions, etc., so the Will and Trust can be wound up without any further delay and I then will withdraw all of my objections and demands. Consider this letter my Word is my Bond statement on this matter.
May I point out for anyone who would care, my last letter of Objections was dated July 18, 2017, and Nancy waited until November 16, 2017, to file the Petition For Declaratory Judgment in the Probate Court. That is four months delay that was unnecessary and obviously extended the Trust into another tax year that is clearly Nancy’s fault for delaying her action so long needlessly. No doubt Nancy will try to fault me for another tax year burden and expense and think that that is ethical to subtract that from my inheritance too. Keep it up Nancy, “Angels above us are silent notes taking, of every action; then do what is right.” (LDS Hymn #237)
Presented for all to consider,
Brother Jim Kelley, true copy that was sent by USPS prepaid mail to the Law Firm.
———–End Of Throw In The Towel Letter———–
Is this NOT amazing that a Probate judge would not have considered this Throw In The Towel Letter, and the time line, chain of events, and rendered the two Court Cases, and the two Depositions, as unwarranted and unnecessary? What is it that could possibly be in the laws that would not keep a fang of Satanic, American Nazi, Unethical, Shyster, blood sucker, Lawyers/Trustees, as well as a known Satanic. American Nazi, SS, “den of thieves” MANN, WALTER, BISHOP & SHERMAN, Law Firm, from continuing to come after the one and only faithful and innocent Beneficiary with all of these lawyer abuses?
Early on I gave this “Honorable” Judge the benefit of the doubt, thinking that her hands were tied, she had no other choice somehow, than to judge everything that I presented as Exhibits and Testimony as were “not supported by the evidence, not credible and are without legal basis or authority.” Then two things happened:
First Thing: is when Trustee/Lawyer Nancy Yendes wrote her Infamous Background Letter to the Mo. BAR (see Page #15, MO BAR/Cover-up), Nancy pointed out that the Judge, “the Court exercised its discretion…” (last sentence, first paragraph) with its Judgment. I thught all along that the Honorable Judge acted strictly according to the law and had no discretion in the Judgment matters. Then I took another look at the Judgment and saw that the Judge’s own written words were, “Accordingly, this Court now exercises its discretion and determines against Beneficiary Defendant James W. Kelley…” (Judgment, page 2, last sentence; see Page #7, Probate Judgment, top photo).
So when I gave the benefit of the doubt to, and for, the “Honorable” 🙁 Judge, I did not realize that this Judge has the discretion to rule in favor of my Dad and myself; and against the Satanic, American Nazis for their Nazi crimes. This is a horse of a different color, and whole another ball game, because it is then obvious that this Judge sided with the Satanic, American Nazis, and just like the Northside Christian Church has proven itself, is no better than the Satanic, American Nazis that they enable and support.
If there was no law demanding that this judge rule against my Dad and myself, then based on the evidence and testimony as my Exhibits A-E, this Judge legislated from the bench and ignored the most basic Laws Of Nature and God.
Second Thing: is after pondering, praying, and evaluating this whole matter in the light that the “Honorable” 🙁 Judge had the discretion to rule according to the evidence and testimony and in favor of the Grantor’s original intent and the Beneficiary’s honest efforts to stand up for his own Dad’s original intent.
According to the Mo. BAR’s published pamphlet a Will and Trust are self proving, so my Exhibit A, the Will and Trust was the evidence, in and of itself, irrespective of anything else that was presented. SO THIS JUDGE IS IN ERROR IN HER JUDGMENT TO CLAIM THAT THE WILL AND TRUST “ARE NOT SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE!” This would be the same thing as claiming that black is white, up is down, etc. Just plain Satanic, American Nazi, Court Judgment lies and frauds.
What was this “Honorable” 🙁 Judge thinking when she claimed a Throw In The Towel Letter, was “not supported by the evidence, not credible and are without legal basis or authority?” How can a total surrender not be creditable to stop the Lawyer abuses and actions that ran up $20,000.00 in excessive and unethical “legal fees.”
There is one thing absolutely for sure: THESE SATANIC, AMERICAN NAZI, LAWYERS AND TRUSTEES, AND THE”DEN OF THIEVES” LAW FIRM, MUST HAVE BEEN PRETTY SURE OF THEMSELVES THAT THIS “HONORABLE” 🙁 JUDGE WAS GOING TO GO ALONG WITH THEM OR WHY WOULD THEY HAVE RUN UP $20,000.00 IN “LEGAL FEES” NEEDLESSLY, AFTER THE THROW IN THE TOWEL LETTER, IF THEY WEREN’T PRETTY SURE, EARLY ON, THAT THE FIX WAS IN, THE DEAL WAS MADE ALREADY WITH THE JUDGE, OR WHY WOULD THESE LAWYERS AND TRUSTEES HAVE TAKEN A CHANCE LIKE THIS IF THE LEGAL FEES $20,000.00 COULD HAVE HAD ANY CHANCE TO BACKFIRED ON THEM?
The “Honorable” 🙁 Judge asking Lawyer Carl Yendes, “Are you sure you want to do this?, may have been a diversionary tactic to throw me off the track, and it would be interesting IF THAT JUDGE’S QUESTION IS STILL IN THE COURT RECORDS. One thing for sure is, with this Judge asking this question, like she did, gives the impression that she did not think assessing the legal fees against me, Jim Kelley, was a good idea. Apparently something changed, or nothing changed if the fix was in already, because according to the Judge’s own statement the “Honorable” Court had its discretion to rule either way on everything.
Here is the Correct Principle when it comes to honoring any position, the person in that position deserves to be honored UNTIL THAT PERSON PROVES THAT THEY NO LONGER DESERVE THAT POSITION OF BEING HONORED. So it would seem with this Probate Court Judge, she has dishonored herself, and her Court, even below the other Satanic, American Nazi, Unethical, Shyster, Lawyers, Trustees, and the “den of thieves” Law Firm because:
This Judge supported all of the Satanic, American Nazi, actions, activities, lies, frauds, abuses, Nazi crimes, making her just as bad as the Lawyers, Trustees, and the Law Firm that abused my Dad and myself, but is is even worse for this Judge.
This Judge had a higher level of Fiduciary Duty to honor the Sacred Public Trust vested in her as a Judge, and her violations of that Sacred Public Trust sink her even below all of these other Satanic, American Nazi, Lawyers, Trustees, and the “den of thieves” Law Firm, involved, who have proven themselves lower in stature and ethics than a street prostitute whore, whom whores may be somewhat honest persons.
Sorry Judge, you made your own bed to lie in with the company of these Satanic, American Nazis, and their Nazism has rubbed off on you (like stink on shit), and may never wash off, because your SNL style Judgment is in writing and is forever and you will have to answer on your Judgment Day before God for that if no one holds you accountable in this life before then. You could do some repenting “of your evil ways,” and the Missouri Rules Of Professional Conduct has specific provisions for you to do that, if you would just set aside your PRIDE, and just do it!!!
I am very Pleased to be an American, and ready, willing, and able to stand up for America “in a never ending battle for Truth, Justice, and the American Way!”
P.S. Thank you Trustee/Lawyer, Nazi, Nancy Yendes, for alerting me to the fact, in your Infamous Background Letter, that it was discretion, and not the law, that led to the infamous Twilight Zone, Alice’s Wonderland, American Nazi, Judgment. If it were not for you, Nazi Nancy, I would not have gone back and rechecked on that point.
Nazi Nancy’s revelation was a very useful revelation just like Maureen’s Acceding e-mail (Page #37, “Acceding” Maureen) was a very useful revelation that helps prove that my Dad was kidnapped against his will by 21st Century Nazis because he was “hesitant” at first. This was nothing less than a date rape where the woman is “hesitant,” says NO!, but the ass hole guy gets her drunk, or what ever, and then the woman quits resisting and is in reality raped by a Nazi guy that could be prosecuted and convicted on Date Rape charges. A Nazi, is a Nazi, is a Nazi, “and that’s the Truth”!!!
This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.
What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.
As always if the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.