44. Goodly Parents

 

 

My Dad’s 95th Birthday Party

This Goodly Parents Page is intended to illustrate to the Politician, and the citizen who may contact their Politician, that these Unethical, Shyster Lawyers and Trustees were so “green with envy,” so desperate to find fault with my Dad, and myself (Jim Kelley), so greedy for my Dad’s money, that they tried to turn around GOOD WORKS as if they were bad works, proving that these Criminally Insane, Double-Crossing, No Class, No Dignity, Ungrateful, Perpetual Complainer, Pathological Liar, Kleptomaniac, Narcissist, Control Freak, Selfish, Malicious, Nefarious Predator, Blood Sucker, Bottom Feeder, Cold Blooded, Parasite, Unethical Shyster Lawyers, Trustees, Mental Nut-Jobs, associated with “a den of thieves” satanic Law Firm, are all of this description and even more evil represented by their own personal Dark Satanic Spirits!

During the abusive 4 hour Deposition against me, known liar-thief Trustee/Lawyer Carl, also the Municipal Court Head Prosecuting Attorney (I wonder how that works out for the people?), asked me if I knew that my Dad was known as the “rock star” at the Senior’s Center in Wheatland? I said I did not know that, I knew my Dad went to the Senior’s Center most every day for lunch for many years, but I did not know that he was known as the “rock star.” Then Trustee/Lawyer Carl advised me that my Dad was and it was because my Dad bought everyone their lunch, every day, at the Senior’s Center and Trustee/Lawyer Carl expressed this as if it was wrong that my Dad would buy everyone their lunch with my Dad’s own money.

Not sure how my Dad could have bought everyone’s lunch every day like the known liar-thief Carl claimed. Did my Dad have a running tab that everyone said, Charge my lunch to Dale? Did everyone wait until my Dad arrived and they got in line behind my Dad and my Dad said, Everyone behind me, let me pay for them too?

Obviously to claim that my Dad paid for everyone’s lunch, every day, at a Senior’s Center where 100 people eat is bazaar and here is the truth about such known liars and why they lie like this. When a person is a known liar and thief like Trustee/Lawyer Carl has proven himself to be, the Spirit of God withdraws Himself from that person, and the Dark Spirit of Satan enters and occupies that void left by the Spirit of God, and the Dark Spirit of Satan directs that person to babble on, like a mindless gerbil on a treadmill, with endless mindless ramblings on of speech designed to shock and offend the reasonable thinker. Satan delights in shocking and offending reasonable thinking people and those whom Satan possesses are nothing more than “useful idiots” for Satan’s delight.

My Dad was virtually blind, the Sheriff personally told my Dad not to drive, so my Dad had to have someone drive him to the Senior’s Center, and there were neighbors who carpooled and took my Dad with them religiously everyday. I am sure my Dad, out of courtesy for taking him along in this carpool (my Dad could not precipitate and do any driving), may have bought the lunches of the people who made the efforts to include him in their carpooling to the Senior’s Center. That was perhaps 3 to 4 people’s lunch, plus his own lunch, on the average, as how many meals my Dad probably purchased every day. The suggested lunch donation price at that time was $3.50 per meal so that would have been $3.50 X 4 average = $14 and that included Dad’s meal.

Now think this through; the Senor’s Center was about 10 miles away so a round trip would have been 20 miles. Figuring 50 cents per mile that round trip would have been worth $10. So Dad got his transportation, and some friendly company along the way, and ended up paying $4 for a meal that it was “suggested” a senior pays $3.50 for anyway, for the $14 that he spent each day. My Dad would have considered that a bargain and my Dad did not have the expense of driving his own car. How does the reader think about that?

I do not know what the circumstances would have to be for my Dad to pay for everyone’s meal, especially on a consistent basis as the known liar-thief Trustee/Lawyer Carl eluded to, but I really do not think that happened, except perhaps a few times if ever, but even if my Dad did somehow arrange to pay for everyone’s meals on a regular basis, SO WHAT, IT WAS HIS MONEY!!!!

The way this was brought up during the Deposition a person would have thought that the known liar-thief Trustee/Lawyer Carl considered Dad’s money that he spent on lunches, the Carl’s own money and perhaps the Carl did consider that my Dad was spending the Carl’s own money, along with the other Trustees thinking that was also their money, and that was the exact reason why they became so aggressive in their “capture” of my Dad behind my back, tricking him into signing the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust so they could “preserve the Will” (meaning keeping as much as possible in the Trust for them later as their Inheritance) behind my back, which money they unitedly considered was their money, their rights for an Inheritance, and Dad was spending their Inheritance, how dare he do that! I think the evidence is pretty strong the Trustees’ motivation in all of this, in all that that they did do to my Dad, and continue to do to me was to “protect the Will” and preserve as much of Dad’s money for their Inheritance as possible, as well as steal as much money from a poor person (Jim Kelley), as possible. This is how much these known liars and thieves worship money, and deny God!

This picture was taken March 31, 2012, the only birthday my Dad had after the capture with any kind of enjoyment as a POW, and this was pretty grim and lonely. The Capture was Memorial Day Week End 2011, and my Dad was placed in a full-time Alzheimer’s unit on 24 hour lock down on June 25, 2012, so this picture was just short of 3 months before my Dad’s medical issues that almost ended his life in the hospital. For sure my Dad does NOT look like a “rock star” in this picture and the stingy assisted care home provided only one candle. What a difference from being with his friends in Hickory Country and the “rock star” of the Senior Center where they would have no doubt had a birthday party for my Dad, with a cake, with more than one candle, so may candles—call the Fire Department to stand by. Actually the firemen knew my Dad and probably would have been at the Hickory County birthday party for my Dad anyway.

The reason there is two cakes is for all the residents, and hired help, that would eventually wonder by during lunch and afterwards, probably not even seeing my Dad that day.

So that is the sad tale of my Dad’s 95th birthday, as a POW in the 21st Century of Elder Abuses, compared to past birthdays where he was, according to the known liar-thief Carl, “a rock star.”

Never Ending Battle

This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.

This is a picture of my Dad on his birthday at the Gardens assisted living complex in Springfield, Mo. The Gardens dutifully baked two birthday cakes but my Dad was pretty lonely that day without his Hickory County friends that were some 70 miles away. Two cakes were baked no doubt because there would be a lot of people who would help themselves to a piece of cake later during lunch time but were not around as a true friend like Dad had in Hickory County. I don’t think my Dad deserved this and his sad sack expression on his face says it all.

My sisters and I were born of Goodly Parents, and had the same basic childhoods and up brings as each other, so what happened where I am the only staunch supporter of my Dad, and my two sisters seemed to have it in for my Dad to the point they took their father “for a ride” against his will (my opinion based on the facts), from his paid for home in Hickory County, Mo., to Springfield, Mo. at The Gardens assisted living apartment complex ($4,000 a month?), and soon after that they assisted in my Dad signing his Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust and eventually participated in what has to be considered their united Revenge Cremation Insult (I suppose I should claim this is my opinion).

The evidence of the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust is right in the language of that Will and Trust:

REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT

ARTICLE I

DURING GRANTOR’S LIFETIME

“I. Grantor, DALE EDGAR KELLEY, reserves the right, at any time and from time to time, to alter, amend, or revoke this agreement in whole or in part, and to add, subtract or withdraw any property there from only with the written consent of the Trustee.” (Page 2, bolding and underlining added to provide emphasis.)

“II. [If Grantor decides, or anyone else decided for him, to move residence to another place than where he is, that can only be done] as agreed to by the Trustee.” (Page 2, bolding and underlining added to provide emphasis.)

“III. The Trustee shall [manage all of the Grantor’s money and pay all of the Grantor’s bills, including] food, care, shelter or maintenance miscellaneous expenses to be paid directly from that [Grantor’s] account by his attorney-in-fact, [PT];” (Page 2, bolding and underlining added to provide emphasis.)

Do I even have to state, as some kind of legal disclaimer, this is my opinion when the language of the Trust specifically sets up conditions of a detained person against his will? Remember, this is the language of a man’s Will and Trust where there is NO Court Ordered Guardianship and the man is virtually blind and partially deaf having to rely on the help of others to know what his Will and Trust said before he signed.

When my Dad walked into the Law Firm he had all of his unalienable Rights intact. When he signed his Will and Trust he lost all of his unalienable Rights consistent with, as if, he were “captured,” “taken for a ride,” held against his will with only one person to lord over him, the PT (my opinion). Is this NOT an Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust? If not, what is it then?

The language in the Will and Trust as self-evident evidence help support an actual “Capture” against the will of my Dad as well as support the desires, plans, of the Trustees to do things behind my back like the “capture” because like the Grantor, my Dad, I lost any and all rights to come to the aid of my own Dad because the language of the Will and Trust state, “…JAMES WILLIAM KELLEY OR HIS SPOUSE not act on my behalf in any capacity whatsoever.” This is as plain as the nose on anyone’s face, these “not act on my behalf in any capacity whatsoever” were intended for one purpose, and one purpose only, to keep the #1 Son from ever interfering with the intended and planned Elder Abuses against my own Dad without the #1 Son interfering; which was exactly why the “capture” was done behind the #1 Son’s back, in secret to the #1 Son, so the #1 Son would not do something like call the Sheriff when the #1 Son saw his own Dad was saying NO!

This is similar (in my opinion) to when he was captured by the Nazis in 1944, he was “captured,” “taken for a ride,” held against his will, told where he was to live, how he was to live, and for how long, according to how long the Nazis were in power, very similar to being a POW in the War of Elder Abuses in Springfield, Mo. (my opinion, my words), but without the barbed/razor wire and guards with rifles.

Would it not be honest to suggest my Dad, that”he was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer” (Acts 8:32) when my Dad was led by his daughters, and perhaps the CT son-in-law, and entered “a den of thieves” (Matt. 21:13) Law Firm the day of the signing of his Will and Trust? My Dad was 94 years old, virtually blind, partially deaf, meek as a lamb, totally dependent on others to lead him, guide him, advise him about anything written and was easy pray as a lamb would be to a starving wolf (my words, my opinion).

At the moment of signing my Dad was transfigured from a man having all of his unalienable Rights to a man who had been stripped of all of his unalienable Rights in the twinkling of an eye. At the very least this would have to be described as a Twilight Zone moment.

The language in the Trust make the PT a Commandant over my Dad, similar (my opinion) to a Nazi Commandant over the POW camps my Dad was in during WW II.

The sworn testimony of the NNCT in the Probate Court Hearing was the NNCT knew nothing about what the PT was doing because she was three places behind the PT in order of succession. With this sworn, recorded, testimony we learn that the CT by reasonable extension, and the NNCT, because they were not at the helm as the PT, they are the same as an “I know nothing” Sargent in this whole POW in the War of Elder Abuses matter (POW in the War of Elder Abuses as my opinion for now. Others will follow.).

As was pointed out in the Probate Documents and testimony all of the Trustees were present during the “capture,” “taken for a ride,” experience. The NNCT (who was there during the “capture”) even sent me an e-mail recently stating her personal observation was that her father was reluctant at first but eventually came along willingly. To think just because a father came along willingly after being reluctant at first, no doubt saying NO! several times, and to think that taking him against his will by intimidation is justified somehow is just plain wrong and anyone with any kind of a moral compass would know better than that? To think what the Trustees seem to claim that their “capture” was somehow ethical or in any way honest somehow would be akin to trying to justify rape because “NO means yes.”

When the Trustees (before the signing of the Will and Trust, before they were actual Trustees) showed up at Dad’s house, apparently unannounced, with the “Two Men And A Truck” moving company, six people total, crowed in an 800 square foot house, and the father says NO! to his moving out, or any other signs of reluctance, the ethical thing to do, the honest thing to do, would have been for the Trustees to take their imposing moving company (which they hired apparently without the father’s knowledge because the father was “reluctant” in all of this) and just go home and leave their father in his own home where he obviously wanted to stay and actually belonged. Remember, this moving of the father was done behind the back of, in secret from, the #1 Son of my Dad, myself, Jim Kelley, so how honest and ethical was that?

Also it was pointed out in the Court Hearing that the NNCT had to have signed the Authorization For Cremation certificate because if she had not there would have been no cremation. Again the testimony of the NNCT was, I know nothing, not in those exact words but the meaning was the same.

So what on earth happened that my sisters did these things to my Dad and I was the one and only staunch supporter of my Dad and his Will and Trust even when the Will and Trust was obviously flawed on many counts against my Dad and myself?

Looking back on our childhoods perhaps my sisters were jealous of my Dad’s and my relationship. We spent a lot of time together in activities like the BSA, Little League Base Ball, fishing, etc., where we were gone for a dozen or more weekends a year leaving the sisters behind, at home, with Mom.

My Dad did tease my youngest sister (PT) at times. One of those examples was he would call her “Nutsy the Nazi” (rhymed with her name) and she would run to our couch and rock real hard, so hard that she beat the back of the couch into a dimpled cavity (four different places) bigger than her head that would not recover. My Dad thought this was funny, no doubt my Dad was wrong for doing this like this, and perhaps this is something that has left a lasting mental disorder of some kind with my sister that yearns for revenge? Don’t know, I am not qualified to say, this would be the place for a qualified psychologist to determine after many tests and counselling sessions, and that would perhaps be no more than an educated guess. I am just asking the question, based on my observations during our childhood years, and my observations and question today; why would any loving daughter cremate their own father when they knew good and well that their father wanted to be buried in a casket? That has to be a mental disorder of some kind as my stated opinion and I am confident this will be the opinion of many people among the legislators in the near future after legislator reviewing all of the evidence.

With such outrageous behavior (my opinion with the proof of the Will and Trust, Cremation Insult, denials, etc.) being demonstrated by the Trustees, TA, LF, and considering the high level of mental illness in our Society and Nation today, it would be imprudent to not consider the possibility of mental illness as a factor in all of this.

After I read the Will and Trust (two years after my Dad’s death) the PT’s excuses for cremation were/are as varied and changing as the weather in Missouri:

One excuse near the beginning was she wanted her father to be close to Dad’s nephew, Danny, who was also cremated. I said that that is not what the Will and Trust instructed.

Another excuse was the view from the cremation urn vaults is better from there than in the grave yard. But that is not what the Will and Trust instructed and Dad can not see the view now, he is dead.

Another excuse was in this way her father and mother could be next to each other. The Will and Trust instructed they were to be together in Dad’s casket, in a grave, and the Veteran’s Cemetery Rules allow for that exact thing as instructed and recorded in the Will.

Another excuse was on the same day as my Dad’s death she and the NNCT decided to cremate their father and asked if I would join in as this was what Dad really wanted and I went along because I had not read the Will and Trust at the time my Dad had passed away and did not know of Dad’s instructions to be buried in a casket.

The excuse the PT gave under oath, in Court, with tears from a daughter capable of a Revenge Cremation Insult (my opinion again), was the grave yard of the Veteran’s Cemetery was in a flood plain and she did not want to have her father’s casket in flood waters. That excuse just does not hold water (pun intended) and does not comply with the instructions of the Will which gave discretion to bury in another cemetery but does not give discretion to cremate. I stated in the Court Hearing that that Veteran’s Cemetery has never flooded and even if it did the caskets by law are air and water tight so there is no harm in case of flood waters anyway.

I also talked to the Veteran’s Cemetery Director on Friday, June 15, 2018, (two months after the April 4, 2018 Probate Court hearing) and he stated to me that since the year 2000, the year the Cemetery opened, there has been no flooding and there is no reason to ever anticipate flooding where the grave sites are today, which would be among the grave sites my Dad would have been buried in if the Trustees (and the LF) had done their due diligence (my opinion) and followed the Will instructions to bury my Dad. My Dad’s earthly grave would have been high and dry to this day and forever according to the Army Corps of Engineers, etc., which were/are more qualified than PT to make this judgment call. This seems to be another example that the PT was “Wrong Way” in her testimony in Court again which may have misled the Judge on purpose.

Some children have the misfortune to have bad parents. That is not the case with my sisters and myself. We had goodly parents that taught us correct principles to live by, some of those correct principles of honesty were obviously ignored by my two sisters during their dealings with their own father late in his life.

I feel sorry for children like the “Gentle Giant” who obviously had a step-father who was capable of insighting a riot, yelling “burn this bitch down” two or more times.

Poor, poor, “Gentle Giant” for not having the kinds of goodly parents like I had which no doubt led to his confrontation(s) with the police which ended in his being shot by a policeman. Poor, poor, “Gentle Giant,” he, like many others with bad parents, don’t have a chance in life unless something very good enters their lives to change their predetermined, predestined, bad/criminal course in life, because of the bad examples of their parent(s). This may be a hard pill for some to swallow but it is undeniably the true.

My sisters, and myself, do not have the excuse of bad parents, we had very goodly parents, and that should have made the difference for my sisters (my opinion) in how honorably they treated their own father from the “capture” (my word, my opinion) to the Revenge Cremation Insult (my words, my opinion) and even to the continued denials that they have done anything wrong as is preserved and documented in the Probate Court Hearing testimony and documents, as fact, not just opinion.

Fact: Continued denials that a person has done wrong, in the face of proof that they have done wrong, is considered one of the more serious mental disorders. The key here is the proof, did the Trustees, TA, and the LF do wrong according to the proof? Apparently the Probate Laws support that they did as being not wrong according to the Probate Court Judgment.

Obviously what the Trustees, TA, and the LF did would be against the Laws and Commandments of God so if the Probate Laws and the Laws of God are in opposition to each other than the Probate Laws are an opponent to God and that is a very serious and dangerous situation for a Nation to be in. This is a major reason for this website, to help bring the laws of the land into conformity with the Laws of God. God being all knowing, all wise, and the Author of Truth, Justice, and the correct/original American Way would NOT be a God to be in opposition to as His opponent. Not good, not smart, not prudent!

May God bless America.

May God bless all goodly parents.

May God bless all children of bad parents so the children can have a chance to learn right from wrong before they really hurt themselves, really hurt someone else, and get into some real trouble; please God, bless all the children of bad parents so they can have a chance in life too. A-men.

Bro. Jim

P.S. Here is a song for these pathetic hound dog, known liars and thieves, Lawyers and Trustees that have never caught a rabbit (apparently they fell down the rabbit hole trying) and are no ones friend, and have their hand out to steal other’s money every chance that they have. “For without [outside of Heaven] are the dogs…and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.” Revelation 22:15

————————————————————-

 

This website is political speech for the purpose to convince enough politicians who are in the Missouri State Legislator to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. By necessity this political speech has to be straight forward, containing the raw truth, to raise the awareness of the State Legislators for the real and desperate need of this Bill of Rights to protect the innocent Grantors and Beneficiaries from the evil designs of unethical shyster lawyers. This is a Human Rights matter and I would think it should receive bipartisan support; I pray so, I hope so.

This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.

What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious  self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.

As always if the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.