44. Goodly Parents/Family

Above is the Dale Kelley Family in about 1956.

Nazi Lawyer/Trustee Nancy Yendes is in Dad’s right arm.

Being born of goodly parents helps to have knowledge of the goodness and mysteries of God, so what happened to Nazi Lawyer/Trustee Nancy Yendes?

My Dad’s 95th Birthday Party

This Goodly Parents Page is intended to illustrate to the Politician, and the citizen who may contact their Politician, that these Unethical, Shyster Lawyers and Trustees were so “green with envy,” so desperate to find fault with my Dad, and myself (Jim Kelley), so greedy for my Dad’s money, that they tried to turn around GOOD WORKS as if they were bad works, proving that these Criminally Insane, Double-Crossing, No Class, No Dignity, Ungrateful, Perpetual Complainer, Pathological Liar, Kleptomaniac, Narcissist, Control Freak, Selfish, Malicious, Nefarious Predator, Blood Sucker, Bottom Feeder, Cold Blooded, Parasite, Unethical Shyster Lawyers, Trustees, Mental Nut-Jobs, associated with “a den of thieves” satanic Law Firm, are all of this description and even more evil represented by their own personal Dark Satanic Spirits!

During the abusive 4 hour Deposition against me, known liar-thief Trustee/Lawyer Carl, also the Municipal Court Head Prosecuting Attorney (I wonder how that works out for the people?), asked me if I knew that my Dad was known as the “rock star” at the Senior’s Center in Wheatland? I said I did not know that, I knew my Dad went to the Senior’s Center most every day for lunch for many years, but I did not know that he was known as the “rock star.” Then Trustee/Lawyer Carl advised me that my Dad was and it was because my Dad bought everyone their lunch, every day, at the Senior’s Center and Trustee/Lawyer Carl expressed this as if it was wrong that my Dad would buy everyone their lunch with my Dad’s own money.

Not sure how my Dad could have bought everyone’s lunch every day like the known liar-thief Carl claimed. Did my Dad have a running tab that everyone said, Charge my lunch to Dale? Did everyone wait until my Dad arrived and they got in line behind my Dad and my Dad said, Everyone behind me, let me pay for them too?

Obviously to claim that my Dad paid for everyone’s lunch, every day, at a Senior’s Center where 100 people eat is bazaar and here is the truth about such known liars and why they lie like this. When a person is a known liar and thief like Trustee/Lawyer Carl has proven himself to be, the Spirit of God withdraws Himself from that person, and the Dark Spirit of Satan enters and occupies that void left by the Spirit of God, and the Dark Spirit of Satan directs that person to babble on, like a mindless gerbil on a treadmill, with endless mindless ramblings on of speech designed to shock and offend the reasonable thinker. Satan delights in shocking and offending reasonable thinking people and those whom Satan possesses are nothing more than “useful idiots” for Satan’s delight.

My Dad was virtually blind, the Sheriff personally told my Dad not to drive, so my Dad had to have someone drive him to the Senior’s Center, and there were neighbors who carpooled and took my Dad with them religiously everyday. I am sure my Dad, out of courtesy for taking him along in this carpool (my Dad could not precipitate and do any driving), may have bought the lunches of the people who made the efforts to include him in their carpooling to the Senior’s Center. That was perhaps 3 to 4 people’s lunch, plus his own lunch, on the average, as how many meals my Dad probably purchased every day. The suggested lunch donation price at that time was $3.50 per meal so that would have been $3.50 X 4 average = $14 and that included Dad’s meal.

Now think this through; the Senor’s Center was about 10 miles away so a round trip would have been 20 miles. Figuring 50 cents per mile that round trip would have been worth $10. So Dad got his transportation, and some friendly company along the way, and ended up paying $4 for a meal that it was “suggested” a senior pays $3.50 for anyway, for the $14 that he spent each day. My Dad would have considered that a bargain and my Dad did not have the expense of driving his own car. How does the reader think about that?

I do not know what the circumstances would have to be for my Dad to pay for everyone’s meal, especially on a consistent basis as the known liar-thief Trustee/Lawyer Carl Yendes claimed as fact, but I really do not think that that happened, except perhaps a few times if ever, but even if my Dad did somehow arrange to pay for everyone’s meals on a regular basis, SO WHAT, IT WAS HIS MONEY!!!!

The way this was brought up during the Deposition a person would have thought that the known liar-thief Trustee/Lawyer Carl Yendes considered Dad’s money that he spent on lunches, that that was Carl’s own money and perhaps Carl did consider that my Dad was spending Carl’s own money, along with the other Trustees thinking that was also their money, and that was the exact reason why they became so aggressive in their “capture” of my Dad behind my back, tricking him into signing the Nazi Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust so they could “preserve the Will” (meaning keeping as much as possible in the Trust for them later as their Inheritance) behind my back, which money they unitedly considered was their personal and own money, their rights for their own and personal Inheritance, and Dad was spending their personal money Inheritance, how dare he do that!!! I think the evidence is pretty strong the Trustees’ motivation in all of this, in all that they did do to my Dad, and continue to do to me, was to “protect the Will” and preserve as much of Dad’s money for their personal Inheritance as possible, as well as steal as much money from a poor person (Jim Kelley), as possible. This is how much these known Nazi liars and Nazi thieves worship money, and deny/despise God!

This picture was taken March 31, 2012, the only birthday my Dad had after the capture with any kind of enjoyment with very few people as a POW, and this was pretty grim and lonely whom my Dad had lots of friends in Hickory County that would have participated in his birthday if he would have still been in Hickory County instead of the Socialist Greene County, Mo. The Capture was Memorial Day Week End 2011, and my Dad was placed in a full-time Alzheimer’s unit on 24 hour lock down on June 25, 2012, so this picture was 10 months after his Capture and just short of 3 months before my Dad’s medical issues that almost ended his life in the hospital that led to the 24 hour lock down. For sure my Dad does NOT look like a “rock star” buying everything for everybody in this picture and the stingy assisted care home provided only one candle. What a difference from being with his friends in Hickory Country and the “rock star” of the Senior Center where they would have no doubt had a birthday party for my Dad, with a cake, with more than one candle, so may candles—call the Fire Department to stand by. Actually the firemen knew my Dad and probably would have been at the Hickory County birthday party for my Dad anyway.

The reason there is two cakes is for all the residents, and hired help, that would eventually wonder by during lunch and afterwards, probably not even seeing my Dad that day.

So that is the sad tale of my Dad’s 95th birthday, as a POW in the 21st Century of Elder Abuses, compared to past birthdays where he was, according to the known liar-thief Carl Yendes, “a rock star.”

Never Ending Battle

This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.

This is a picture of my Dad on his birthday at the Gardens assisted living complex in Springfield, Mo. The Gardens dutifully baked two birthday cakes but my Dad was pretty lonely that day without his Hickory County friends that were some 70 miles away. Two cakes were baked no doubt because there would be a lot of people who would help themselves to a piece of cake later during lunch time but were not around as a true friend like Dad had in Hickory County. I don’t think my Dad deserved this and his sad sack expression on his face says it all.

My sisters and I were born of Goodly Parents, and had the same basic childhoods and up brings as each other, so what happened where I am the only staunch supporter of my Dad, and my two sisters seemed to have it in for my Dad to the point they took their father “for a ride” against his will (my opinion based on the facts), from his paid for home in Hickory County, Mo., to Springfield, Mo. at The Gardens assisted living apartment complex ($4,000 a month?), and soon after that they assisted in my Dad signing his Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust and eventually participated in what has to be considered their united Revenge Cremation Insult (I suppose I should claim this is my opinion).

The evidence of the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust is right in the language of that Will and Trust:

REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT

ARTICLE I

DURING GRANTOR’S LIFETIME

“I. Grantor, DALE EDGAR KELLEY, reserves the right, at any time and from time to time, to alter, amend, or revoke this agreement in whole or in part, and to add, subtract or withdraw any property there from only with the written consent of the Trustee.” (Page 2, bolding and underlining added to provide emphasis.)

“II. [If Grantor decides, or anyone else decided for him, to move residence to another place than where he is, that can only be done] as agreed to by the Trustee.” (Page 2, bolding and underlining added to provide emphasis.)

“III. The Trustee shall [manage all of the Grantor’s money and pay all of the Grantor’s bills, including] food, care, shelter or maintenance miscellaneous expenses to be paid directly from that [Grantor’s] account by his attorney-in-fact, [PT];” (Page 2, bolding and underlining added to provide emphasis.)

Do I even have to state, as some kind of legal disclaimer, this is my opinion when the language of the Trust specifically sets up conditions of a detained person against his will? Remember, this is the language of a man’s Will and Trust where there is NO Court Ordered Guardianship and the man is virtually blind and partially deaf having to rely on the help of others to know what his Will and Trust said before he signed.

When my Dad walked into the Law Firm he had all of his unalienable Rights intact. When he signed his Will and Trust he lost all of his unalienable Rights consistent with, as if, he were “captured,” “taken for a ride,” held against his will with only one person to lord over him, the PT (my opinion). Is this NOT an Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust? If not, what is it then?

The language in the Will and Trust as self-evident evidence help support an actual “Capture” against the will of my Dad as well as support the desires, plans, of the Trustees to do things behind my back like the “capture” because like the Grantor, my Dad, I lost any and all rights to come to the aid of my own Dad because the language of the Will and Trust state, “…JAMES WILLIAM KELLEY OR HIS SPOUSE not act on my behalf in any capacity whatsoever.” This is as plain as the nose on anyone’s face, these “not act on my behalf in any capacity whatsoever” were intended for one purpose, and one purpose only, to keep the #1 Son from ever interfering with the intended and planned Elder Abuses against my own Dad without the #1 Son interfering; which was exactly why the “capture” was done behind the #1 Son’s back, in secret to the #1 Son, so the #1 Son would not do something like call the Sheriff when the #1 Son saw his own Dad was saying NO!

This is similar (in my opinion) to when he was captured by the Nazis in 1944, he was “captured,” “taken for a ride,” held against his will, told where he was to live, how he was to live, and for how long, according to how long the Nazis were in power, very similar to being a POW in the War of Elder Abuses in Springfield, Mo. (my opinion, my words), but without the barbed/razor wire and guards with rifles.

Would it not be honest to suggest my Dad, that”he was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer” (Acts 8:32) when my Dad was led by his daughters, and perhaps the CT son-in-law, and entered “a den of thieves” (Matt. 21:13) Law Firm the day of the signing of his Will and Trust? My Dad was 94 years old, virtually blind, partially deaf, meek as a lamb, totally dependent on others to lead him, guide him, advise him about anything written and was easy pray as a lamb would be to a starving wolf (my words, my opinion).

At the moment of signing my Dad was transfigured from a man having all of his unalienable Rights to a man who had been stripped of all of his unalienable Rights in the twinkling of an eye. At the very least this would have to be described as a Twilight Zone moment.

The language in the Trust make the PT a Commandant over my Dad, similar (my opinion) to a Nazi Commandant over the POW camps my Dad was in during WW II.

The sworn testimony of the NNCT in the Probate Court Hearing was the NNCT knew nothing about what the PT was doing because she was three places behind the PT in order of succession. With this sworn, recorded, testimony we learn that the CT by reasonable extension, and the NNCT, because they were not at the helm as the PT, they are the same as an “I know nothing” Sargent in this whole POW in the War of Elder Abuses matter (POW in the War of Elder Abuses as my opinion for now. Others will follow.).

As was pointed out in the Probate Documents and testimony all of the Trustees were present during the “capture,” “taken for a ride,” experience. The NNCT (who was there during the “capture”) even sent me an e-mail recently stating her personal observation was that her father was reluctant at first but eventually came along willingly. To think just because a father came along willingly after being reluctant at first, no doubt saying NO! several times, and to think that taking him against his will by intimidation is justified somehow is just plain wrong and anyone with any kind of a moral compass would know better than that? To think what the Trustees seem to claim that their “capture” was somehow ethical or in any way honest somehow would be akin to trying to justify rape because “NO means yes.”

When the Trustees (before the signing of the Will and Trust, before they were actual Trustees) showed up at Dad’s house, apparently unannounced, with the “Two Men And A Truck” moving company, six people total, crowed in an 800 square foot house, and the father says NO! to his moving out, or any other signs of reluctance, the ethical thing to do, the honest thing to do, would have been for the Trustees to take their imposing moving company (which they hired apparently without the father’s knowledge because the father was “reluctant” in all of this) and just go home and leave their father in his own home where he obviously wanted to stay and actually belonged. Remember, this moving of the father was done behind the back of, in secret from, the #1 Son of my Dad, myself, Jim Kelley, so how honest and ethical was that?

Also it was pointed out in the Court Hearing that the NNCT had to have signed the Authorization For Cremation certificate because if she had not there would have been no cremation. Again the testimony of the NNCT was, I know nothing, not in those exact words but the meaning was the same.

So what on earth happened that my sisters did these things to my Dad and I was the one and only staunch supporter of my Dad and his Will and Trust even when the Will and Trust was obviously flawed on many counts against my Dad and myself?

Looking back on our childhoods perhaps my sisters were jealous of my Dad’s and my relationship. We spent a lot of time together in activities like the BSA, Little League Base Ball, fishing, etc., where we were gone for a dozen or more weekends a year leaving the sisters behind, at home, with Mom.

My Dad did tease my youngest sister (PT) at times. One of those examples was he would call her “Nutsy the Nazi” (rhymed with her name) and she would run to our couch and rock real hard, so hard that she beat the back of the couch into a dimpled cavity (four different places) bigger than her head that would not recover. My Dad thought this was funny, no doubt my Dad was wrong for doing this like this, and perhaps this is something that has left a lasting mental disorder of some kind with my sister that yearns for revenge? Don’t know, I am not qualified to say, this would be the place for a qualified psychologist to determine after many tests and counselling sessions, and that would perhaps be no more than an educated guess. I am just asking the question, based on my observations during our childhood years, and my observations and question today; why would any loving daughter cremate their own father when they knew good and well that their father wanted to be buried in a casket? That has to be a mental disorder of some kind as my stated opinion and I am confident this will be the opinion of many people among the legislators in the near future after legislator reviewing all of the evidence.

With such outrageous behavior (my opinion with the proof of the Will and Trust, Cremation Insult, denials, etc.) being demonstrated by the Trustees, TA, LF, and considering the high level of mental illness in our Society and Nation today, it would be imprudent to not consider the possibility of mental illness as a factor in all of this.

After I read the Will and Trust (two years after my Dad’s death) the PT’s excuses for cremation were/are as varied and changing as the weather in Missouri:

One excuse near the beginning was she wanted her father to be close to Dad’s nephew, Danny, who was also cremated. I said that that is not what the Will and Trust instructed.

Another excuse was the view from the cremation urn vaults is better from there than in the grave yard. But that is not what the Will and Trust instructed and Dad can not see the view now, he is dead.

Another excuse was in this way her father and mother could be next to each other. The Will and Trust instructed they were to be together in Dad’s casket, in a grave, and the Veteran’s Cemetery Rules allow for that exact thing as instructed and recorded in the Will.

Another excuse was on the same day as my Dad’s death she and the NNCT decided to cremate their father and asked if I would join in as this was what Dad really wanted and I went along because I had not read the Will and Trust at the time my Dad had passed away and did not know of Dad’s instructions to be buried in a casket.

The excuse the PT gave under oath, in Court, with tears from a daughter capable of a Revenge Cremation Insult (my opinion again), was the grave yard of the Veteran’s Cemetery was in a flood plain and she did not want to have her father’s casket in flood waters. That excuse just does not hold water (pun intended) and does not comply with the instructions of the Will which gave discretion to bury in another cemetery but does not give discretion to cremate. I stated in the Court Hearing that that Veteran’s Cemetery has never flooded and even if it did the caskets by law are air and water tight so there is no harm in case of flood waters anyway.

I also talked to the Veteran’s Cemetery Director on Friday, June 15, 2018, (two months after the April 4, 2018 Probate Court hearing) and he stated to me that since the year 2000, the year the Cemetery opened, there has been no flooding and there is no reason to ever anticipate flooding where the grave sites are today, which would be among the grave sites my Dad would have been buried in if the Trustees (and the LF) had done their due diligence (my opinion) and followed the Will instructions to bury my Dad. My Dad’s earthly grave would have been high and dry to this day and forever according to the Army Corps of Engineers, etc., which were/are more qualified than PT to make this judgment call. This seems to be another example that the PT was “Wrong Way” in her testimony in Court again which may have misled the Judge on purpose.

Some children have the misfortune to have bad parents. That is not the case with my sisters and myself. We had goodly parents that taught us correct principles to live by, some of those correct principles of honesty were obviously ignored by my two sisters during their dealings with their own father late in his life.

I feel sorry for children like the “Gentle Giant” who obviously had a step-father who was capable of insighting a riot, yelling “burn this bitch down” two or more times.

Poor, poor, “Gentle Giant” for not having the kinds of goodly parents like I had which no doubt led to his confrontation(s) with the police which ended in his being shot by a policeman. Poor, poor, “Gentle Giant,” he, like many others with bad parents, don’t have a chance in life unless something very good enters their lives to change their predetermined, predestined, bad/criminal course in life, because of the bad examples of their parent(s). This may be a hard pill for some to swallow but it is undeniably the true.

My sisters, and myself, do not have the excuse of bad parents, we had very goodly parents, and that should have made the difference for my sisters (my opinion) in how honorably they treated their own father from the “capture” (my word, my opinion) to the Revenge Cremation Insult (my words, my opinion) and even to the continued denials that they have done anything wrong as is preserved and documented in the Probate Court Hearing testimony and documents, as fact, not just opinion.

Fact: Continued denials that a person has done wrong, in the face of proof that they have done wrong, is considered one of the more serious mental disorders. The key here is the proof, did the Trustees, TA, and the LF do wrong according to the proof? Apparently the Probate Laws support that they did as being not wrong according to the Probate Court Judgment.

Obviously what the Trustees, TA, and the LF did would be against the Laws and Commandments of God so if the Probate Laws and the Laws of God are in opposition to each other than the Probate Laws are an opponent to God and that is a very serious and dangerous situation for a Nation to be in. This is a major reason for this website, to help bring the laws of the land into conformity with the Laws of God. God being all knowing, all wise, and the Author of Truth, Justice, and the correct/original American Way would NOT be a God to be in opposition to as His opponent. Not good, not smart, not prudent!

May God bless America.

May God bless all goodly parents.

May God bless all children of bad parents so the children can have a chance to learn right from wrong before they really hurt themselves, really hurt someone else, and get into some real trouble; please God, bless all the children of bad parents so they can have a chance in life too. A-men.

Bro. Jim

P.S. Here is a song for these pathetic hound dog, known liars and thieves, Lawyers and Trustees that have never caught a rabbit (apparently they fell down the rabbit hole trying) and are no ones friend, and have their hand out to steal other’s money every chance that they have. “For without [outside of Heaven] are the dogs…and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.” Revelation 22:15

Could It Be In The Genes? 

 

The Chiropractor was our Uncle Arthur Stockham (legal first name Charles) and the revelations from this newspaper article added to how gruesome the murder of my Grandmother Stockham was that I did not realize before.

The picture on the left is of the Sheriff detectives examining my Grandmother’s dead body. The picture on the right is of my Uncle with his unremorseful look. Merry Christmas mom!

I knew that my Uncle had killed my Grandmother by choking but I did not know it was this much premeditated because my Uncle hated his own mother to the point that he wanted to kill her even if it meant him going to prison, which he did go to prison for about 10 years (as I remember). Furthermore this newspaper article quoted my Uncle that there had been trouble between him and his mother most of his life, that he was not sorry and he would kill his own mother all over again. The fact that my Uncle (with his son Danny) was living under my Grandmother’s roof for several years leading up to this tragedy speaks volumes as to who was the generous and Christian person in this Case!

So how does this fit in with my Dad’s “Capture” against his will, his “Unconditional Surrender” Will and Trust, his being detained against his will as a virtual POW under the thumb of the Nazi/Trustee/Lawyer Nancy Yendes, and the ultimate hateful Screw You Father (and Mother), Revenge Cremation Insult? Hating your own parents to the degree that you want to do them harm no matter what is the common denominator in both of these cases and it may have something to do with a defective gene that carried over into Nancy’s and Maureen’s DNA codes.

What kind of a mental nut job chokes their own mother to death like this, especially when the mother took in the son, and the grandson, after a divorce when the wife of the son abandoned them both and fled to Florida? Just think about this and put yourself at the scene of the crime.

Thoughts precede actions and there obviously were enough evil thoughts in the mind of the son to lead to his putting his hands around his own mother’s neck and start choking the life out of her. At the same time the mother had to have enormous signs/displays of terror in her face while she had to have struggled to get free, and save her own life, and the son kept on choking his own mother in spite of having to witness his own mother’s terror in her face and her struggle to stay alive.

This is the actions of a cold blooded mental nut job that was 35 years old and he did this in front of his own eight year old son, Danny, who witnessed this and this obviously affected him for the rest of his life. In addition to this being cold blooded it was also an obvious and open display of selfishness on the part of my Uncle as he obviously couldn’t have cared less for others, including his own mother and his own son.

Would it be wrong to think that Satan had a strong influence over my Uncle? Obviously my Uncle did NOT have the Love of Jesus in his heart or he would have obeyed the Fifth of the Ten Commandments, to honor your father and mother.

Nancy Yendes: What kind of a mental nut job Captures her own father, takes him for a ride to a known “den of thieves” Law Firm to lawyer trick him into signing an Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust, holds him as a virtual POW for the rest of his life, and than insults him with her Screw You Father (and Mother), Revenge Cremation Insult totally against the Will and Trust instructions that she took an oath to obey; and then attacks and punishes her own Brother for only pointing out that she screwed up for cremating Dad when he instructed in his Will that he was to be buried in a casket, so just admit it and let’s go on. See Page #10, OCDC Nancy/Cover-up, for a detailed list of Nancy’s mental nut job crimes against her own father, her own Brother, against Society, against Nature, and against God. Why in the world didn’t the Mo. BAR, OCDC, directly supervised by the Mo. Supreme Court, not investigate this?

After the visitor reads Page 10 then they can decide where these mental disorder activities come from? A defective gene, law school, on the job mental nut job training at the Springfield, Mo., City Hall, or just a total lack of any respect for Jesus Christ which condition paves the way for an unrestricted conduit straight from the mouth of Satan into Nancy’s brain?

Maureen Royce: Maureen, why would you follow a known Nazi mental nut job like Nancy unless you are a mental nut job yourself with some kind of a DNA defect?

Carl Yendes: Carl, why would you follow a known Nazi mental nut job like Nancy unless you are a mental nut job too. See Page #13, OCDC Carl/Cover-up for a detailed explanation of what a mental nut job Carl is and then ask yourself; Why in the world didn’t the Mo. BAR, OCDC, directly supervised by the Mo. Supreme Court, not investigate this?

Danny Stockham: Danny died a year before my Dad did so he is not around to defend himself with anything I will present here but, that does NOT excuse any DUTY to list what is open, notorious, and obviously bad behavior on the part of Danny that may have contributed to my Dad’s Elder Abuses.

Danny is the son of my Uncle Arthur who murdered my Grandmother Stockham, and Danny was an eye witness to the murder as an eight year old boy. The newspaper account records that the Sheriff’s detectives found Danny watching TV, in the same room as the murder and my Grandmother’s body was laying, so what does this speak about the circumstances? For one, since Danny was not in tears over his own Grandmother’s murder speaks of his upbringing in that house where violence was obviously very common. This speaks volumes as to the kind and generous nature of my Grandmother for allowing such an abuser as her own son to stay with her in her own house under dangerous circumstances like this. It also speaks volumes as to what Danny’s upbringing was in the first eight years of his life and it was not a normal upbringing like would be viewed on popular TV shows of the time period like Leave It To Beaver or Father Knows Best, which shows would be similiar to the family settings my Dad and Mom provided for us children.

So Danny was a victim of circumstances as a young child that he did not have any control over but, none the less these unfortunate circumstances would obviously affected his life, and others lives, for bad, and there is just no getting around this.

When Danny lived with our Kelley family he did some things consistent with a child who was abused in their past. For example one day Danny took a hammer and started to destroy his bicycle. I went into the house and told my Mom and she went into the back yard and stopped Danny but not in time to save the bicycle which was destroyed.

As a teenager Danny was not obedient to any authority and it was decided by my Mom and Dad that it would be best for him to join the Army before he did something really stupid and ended up in jail. So at 17 years of age he joined the Army.

Danny went to Boot Camp and as most new recruits in those days served a tour in Vietnam where he was a Battery Technician in the motor pool on an Army base in Vietnam. His job was to service batteries in the vehicles that came into the motor pool. His duty station was a work bench, and he wore a rubber apron, rubber gloves, and eye goggles, as he would cut open dysfunctional batteries, clean them out, and put them back together to be used again.

After Danny’s Tour he was assigned to the permanent staff, as a clerk in the General’s Office, at Fort Leonard Wood. Easy  duty for a year and then out of the Army. For some reason Danny went AWOL for several weeks, got busted in rank, spent several months in the brig, and was discharged after pleading guilty to an Article 15 (as I remember) instead of being court marshaled as the General wanted to do, because Danny got another commanding officer to do the lesser Article 15 when the General was away from his office.

Danny’s DD 214 apparently had some separation codes that reflected that he was some trouble in the Army and he was not able to get a police officer job which he had applied for in several places in Jackson County. My Mom learned about these tell tail separation codes on a DD 214 and helped Danny get the tell tail codes removed and a new DD 214 issued and then he was able to be hired on the Springfield P.D. So it was my Mom who helped save Danny’s bacon on this one.

Danny was real good at taking tests and he advanced to Sargent and retired as a Police Sargent. I bring this up because it is the same Springfield City Government that Danny worked for that Nancy and Carl worked for too, and the Springfield, Mo., City Government is notorious for being unethical and expecting its employees to follow the same unethical suit too.

The reasons this is very important is that Danny was named Next Successor Trustee in my Dad’s Trust and as such, according to Nancy, would have been at the signing and received a copy of the Trust at the signing. When anyone reads the Will and Trust language they have to be able to understand that Danny should have noticed the abusive language in those documents, and sounded the alarm to rescue my Dad right away, or somehow Danny was ignorant (didn’t know) of the language, was asleep at the crucial time of signing, and/or just didn’t care to listen to and/or read the Will and Trust documents that he was an executor of.

Apparently Danny as a trusted unethical Springfield City Government employee that the other unethical Springfield City Government employees Nancy and Carl felt safe and were confident that Danny would not spill the beans on the others unethical behavior and plans.

What ever the reasons that Danny went along with the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust were lost with him when he died the year before my Dad died, so it will be a mystery why Danny lent his name to such an abusive Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust as he obviously did, without standing up for my Dad, or myself, soon after the signing, in advance before he died, and before my Dad died.

I suppose it is possible that Danny woke up to the fact that his name was attached to his Uncle Dale’s Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust and that is one reason he lost his will to live, refused to go to the hospital when he got sick, and wished to die and leave the mess that his name was attached to behind and perhaps wanted to go and apologize to his Uncle Dale?

Jan Stockham: I think that it will be appropriate to list Jan right after Danny, her husband, on this list because her lack of doing what would have been the right things to do after she obviously knew about the obviously egomaniac and narcissist activities of Nazi Nancy dovetails into what Danny’s lack of ethics were too.

So when Danny died then Jan, by Will and Trust language, assumed the Beneficiary position of Danny. So with these circumstances Jan’s name was a part of the Trust documents when Nancy finally got around to writing them over two years after my Dad’s death (over one year late according to normal Trust procedure and State Law).

Jan found out about the unethical Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust at the same time that I did because I told her; that is if Jan did not already know because her household received copies of the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust about six years before I did, so Jan is without excuse for not knowing about all of this unethical behavior in 2017, at the latest.

Obviously Jan was in a good position to stand up for what was clear and plain to do right by my Dad, and by myself, because her “good name” was involved, but Jan apparently did nothing to right any wrongs that she obviously knew about. So why wouldn’t Jan think to right the wrongs against my Dad, and myself, when she knew, or should have known better?

Perhaps Jan didn’t know any better because her moral compass is not calibrated for what is right or for what is wrong? 

Jan was retired as the #2 Executive for Springfield City Utilities which Utilities were, and still are, notorious for being just as corrupt as its owner, the Springfield, Mo. City Government. There were Springfield NewsLeader newspaper articles, and TV news reports, about Jan being paid an excessive $250,000.00 per year from the public trough back when she was an active Executive, etc. Jan retired with a very generous retirement that is probably by now $250,000.00 per year plus very generous benefits, which is a pretty good hush money provision so Jan will keep her mouth shut about the secret corruptions and secret combinations that she would have to know about with the City Utilities.

Here is an interesting NOTE: With all of the excessive salaries, excessive retirement payments, and excessive benefits, paid to City Utility Executives, why didn’t City Hall transfer some of that money to the Police and Fire Pension Fund instead of always hounding the People for an unethical sales tax to cover those short falls with the Police and Fire Pensions Fund that the City Hall Government caused in the first place? Going to the People and selling them on the special sales tax to fund the Springfield Police and Fire Pension Fund was nothing more than a big lie and the voters didn’t know enough to know any better!

Here is the TRUTH and the LIE pertaining to the Springfield, Mo. Police and Fire Pension Fund: The TRUTH is that in 1994 or 1995 (I can’t remember the exact year) instead of giving the Springfield Police and Fire employees covered under their Pension Fund a cost of living raise for that year they did the “bone head” mistake to give all of those employees their Pension Fund “seed money” back. The City Hall LIE was that the Pension Fund was so well funded at that time that it didn’t matter, wasn’t going to make any difference, if that seed money was given back pertaining to the Pension Fund’s ability to make all of its future retirement payments in the future withut any outside help. That was the LIE and the PROMISE that the Springfield City Hall told the Springfield People at that time.

The kind of “seed money” we are talking about would be all of the money that the employees paid into the Pension Fund out of their pay check deductions. So if an employee was a one year employee they would have about $1,500 given back to them, but if an employee had 20 years of employment their seed money return would be more like $30,000. As would be expected the police and fire employees eagerly had their hands out for these tax free cash returns. Enough money to buy a really nice bass boat, right?

So here is the math for the seed money. Considering in 1995, the P.D. had 200 employees and the F.D. had 100 employees, and considering the average seed money pay back would have been $20,000, then that is $20,000 X 300 employees = $6,000,000 of seed money taken out of the Police and Fire Pension Fund in 1995. Considering compounded interest on that seed money from 1995 forward what the Springfield City Hall did was the same as stealing something like 20 million dollars out of the working capital of the Pension Fund for the future retirement payouts.

So the CONTINUING CITY HALL LIES AND FRAUDS that are told to the Springfield People “Suckers” over the years is that it was/is NOT the fault of City Hall that the Police and Fire Pension Fund doesn’t have enough money to pay for our police and fire retirees retirement payments SO WE NEED A SPECIAL SALES TAX TO PAY THESE POLICE AND FIRE RETIREES WHAT WE PROMISED THEM IN RETIREMENT. And because the news media miserable failed to report what they knew about the seed money pay back, or should have known, then the People didn’t know any better and accepted the City Hall lies about needing a special sales tax.

For sure there are two major groups of Springfield people that know the truth about the seed money pay back, besides the news media, and that would be the City Hall employees and the police (Danny Stockham would be one) and fire employees that eagerly had their hands out to take that tax fee cash money. How does anyone forget something like this if you received this cash back and/or witnessed this and this was REPORTED IN THE NEWS AT THE TIME, with the City Hall PROMISE that the Pension Fund is solvent enough that this seed money pay back will NOT affect the Pension fund’s ability to keep its future retirement payments obligations

The reason that I bring this up here is to illustrate that it is the STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE for Springfield, Mo. City Government leadership to make and live lies and frauds and they expect everyone else on the payroll to be faithful to the Official Government lies and frauds and keep their mouths shut!

Here is a lie that Jan was obviously personally involved in, and a window into Jan’s integrity as a City Government Executive, pertaining to her husband’s funeral talk by Chuck Wooten at the Veteran’s Cemetery. Chuck stated that Danny was a Tank Commander in Vietnam. That is a lie and Jan knew better, or should have known better, and Jan is the only person that Chuck could have gotten that lie from because that information could NOT be on any Army documents! Don’t know why Jan would participate in, cause someone else to participate in, a lie like this but when anyone lies like this that only cheapens the truth about other veterans who were Tank Commanders. Kind of like the pieces of crap frauds who claim to be Congressional Metal of Honor recipients when they really are not.

At Danny’s funeral reception there were some pictures of Danny and one of those pictures was when Danny was in Vietnam and he was wearing his rubber apron, rubber gloves, and goggles, at the battery service bench in the motor pool on a base in Vietnam. The closest Danny got to an Army tank as his Army job would have been to switch out the batteries. To be a tank commander takes a lot of schooling, training, and that would have been done stateside, and for sure tank commanders were not recruited from the battery service station bench in a motor pool, on a base in Vietnam! The saying goes, “There is the right way, there is the wrong way, and there is the Army way,” but not even the Army would be stupid enough to take a motor pool battery service technician and promote them without enough time for the proper training to Tank Commander in a war zone, especially when qualified Tank Commanders were coming to Vietnam from stateside on a regular basis.

Here is a picture of Danny when he was in Vietnam. Does this look like a tank commander or a failed battery recovery technician to you?

Talking about the funeral reception, that was done at one of Jan’s neighbor’s church because apparently Dan and Jan never darkened the door of a church long enough, if ever, to have a church that they could call their own for this funeral reception occasion. This speaks volumes about a person’s character and moral compass to not go to church most of their life and in Jan and Dan’s case perhaps never in their adult life.

How does anyone keep their moral compass calibrated properly unless they get it calibrated at church and, or at least, read the Holy Bible on a regular basis? And this leads one to wonder how does the Springfield City Utilities, supervised by the City Hall, pick their executives when Jan rose to the #2 position without ever going to church? Where was everyone else’s moral compass during Jan’s selection/promotion process?

Godless people lead to godless families, which leads to godless businesses, godless organizations, godless governments, and a godless nation; and the end results are things like the godless Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust, the godless Screw You Father (and Mother), Revenge Cremation Insult, the godless Court Judgment, etc., etc., and that leads to many of the short falls which are listed on this website, including the godless Christemporoi Northside Christian Church, which would have to be as much a godless church as would be possible while that Church’s membership pretends to be Christian.

Jan, I, Jim Kelley, was caught up in a catch-22 situation because I was named a Beneficiary, and at the hands of a gang of the American Nazi Lawyer Mafia who lawyer harpooned me and drug me through all manner of lawyer abuses. You now are also caught up in a catch-22 situation because you were named as a Beneficiary and are now subject to what Nazi Nancy initiated, planned, and followed through with, because, in part, Nazi Nancy plastered your name on the Trust documents making you an intimate witness that is accountable to do the right things against these American Nazi lawyer activities you have personally seen. How does it feel???

Nancy put your name on HER BAD BEHAVIOR Court Petitions so you are involved, like it or not, and if you do nothing then you are making the BOLD STATEMENT that you are just fine with the way things went and are an enabler now with Nazi Nancy’s abuses. Or you could repent and stand up “for Truth, Justice, and the American Way,” which American Way is the basis for the American Public Trough that you received your excessive salary from and now receive your excessive retirement money from.

Jan, take a good look at #18, Throw In Towel; #19. Exculpatory Evidence; #37, “Acceding” Maureen; #16, Nancy’s BRIBE; and you decide if you want to continue to be victimized by Nazi Nancy where your name could be on the evening news all over again, just because your moral compass was, and still is, not calibrated with righteousness? You fumbled the ball before to stand up “for Truth, Justice, and the American Way,” but you could repent and at least ask Nazi Nancy why was she,is she, so mean and vindictive like a Nazi? If Nancy has some kinds of mental disorders, and the proof is overwhelming  that she does, then lets get her to someone professional that can help her, for her sake, for her family’s sake, and for the sake of Society?

Jan, like it or not, when you married Danny you became a part of the family, and when Nazi Nancy plastered your name on the Trust documents you became an intimate witness and part to the egomaniac and narcissist activities of Nazi Nancy, so in reality it is not that easy for you to just wash your hands and just look the other way now. What you have done, what you are doing, and what you are going to do in the future, may be a window of opportunity for the world to see the true character of how City Utilities does its business with the People, especially the poor people, because, like it or not, you as a retired #2 high profile Executive are still representing City Utilities with your personal behavior, good or bad. When you have a chance, be sure to thank Nazi Nancy for what she did to my Dad, to me, and to you also, with her BAD BEHAVIOR that could become a national news story with you becoming front and center in all of that and you have been adequately warned by me anyway.

Jan, may I quote from the Hymn, How Firm A Foundation? “What more can he say than to you he hath said,” meaning what God has said to everyone in His Scriptures. May I ask what more could my Dad say to you, and others, then what was plainly stated in the Will and Trust, “I desire to be buried…I also desire that my wife’s remains [already in an urn] be placed in my [“my” showing implied ownership] casket with my remains for burial.” and if that does not happen then everyone guilty of stealing my Dad’s casket funeral and casket burial shall “forfeit” anything they received, or would have received, through the Trust. Like I said, what more could my Dad have said? And my Dad paid a Law Firm, in good faith on his part to say that; but that Law Firm turned out to be a “den of thieves!” Are you OK with that?

Jan, right now you have chosen to serve the gods of the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia but may I suggest that you go to the Bible, Joshua 24:15, and calibrate your moral compass as to which gods you will serve in the future. In case you don’t have a Bible, you can find this verse on the Internet.

Jan, you catch 22 is a direct result of your husband not doing the right things when he received his copies of the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust. Danny should have demanded that the unconditional surrender conditions be hanged or take his name off as Trustee and Beneficiary; that is if Danny would have been a moral and ethical person. So you have a whole list of people to blame for your catch 22 circumstances right now, but it would not me because I am only holding the guilty accountable for their BAD CONDUCT against my Dad, me, and Society in general; because an attack on one is an attack on all in Society.

Jan, you could do some token repenting if you would want to set the record straight pertaining to your ethics. Go to the gofundme Page on this website and put your name on the list that has contributed $10 (or what ever you choose to donate) as a public statement that you support a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; when he recorded in his Will and Trust that he was to be buried in a casket and paid the money to pay for that in advance. The choice is yours to make and you may want to choose well because the whole world may be watching soon.

Bob Royce: Where was/is your moral compass? You are just as guilty as Jan Stockham for just standing by and doing nothing when you could have stood for something righteous.

Anyone want to compare their moral compass with mine when it comes to standing up for “Truth, Justice, and the American Way?”
Ditto.

Brother Jim Kelley

————————————————————-

 

This website is political speech for the purpose to convince enough politicians who are in the Missouri State Legislator to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. By necessity this political speech has to be straight forward, containing the raw truth, to raise the awareness of the State Legislators for the real and desperate need of this Bill of Rights to protect the innocent Grantors and Beneficiaries from the evil designs of unethical shyster lawyers. This is a Human Rights matter and I would think it should receive bipartisan support; I pray so, I hope so.

This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.

What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious  self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.

As always if the Trustees, Lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.