This is another Chapter in the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia “Secret Combinations” Secret Society Shadow Governments (as predicted by the Ancient American Indian Scriptures).
Fighting Against Jesus!!!
One of the main problems in American governments today is we neither have an Ounce of Prevention OR a Pound of Cure when it comes to wide spread and open government corruptions. After siting dozens of notorious and publicly exposed police department corruptions across America the author states:
“Incidents like these are only a sampling of the extent of police corruptions across the country. But large or small, they have one thing in common. The ordinary police officer, however honest, looked the other way, or got out [of the department], or once in a great while anonymously reported a specific payoff. In none of them was there a cop willing to blow the whistle on his own [the Blue Code of Silence], and then step forward, as would be expected in any other criminal proceeding, and testify openly in court. In none of them was there a Frank Serpico.” Page 140, SERPICO, by Peter Maas, 23rd printing August 1976, copyright 1973.
What the visitor will witness in these seven OCDC BAR Cover-up pages is nothing less than what had gone on in the police departments that so outraged the Public, the People, Society, to the extent that a book like Serpice had 23 printings in four years. My copy is a 23rd printing and I am unable to find how many printings there are after that.
I suppose that I, Jim Kelley, would be comparable to Frank Serpico when it comes to my willingness to stand up against the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia of today. It would seem no one else has the guts to really join me with the one public servant exception of the Honorable Josh Hawley, former Missouri A.G. and current U.S. Senator, and a hand full of people who gave their names on gofundme.
The state BARs should be the Ounce of Prevention for lawyer and judge corruptions. And if the BAR doesn’t do their job then it falls on the Missouri Supreme Court to meter out the Pound of Cure because they have the direct responsibility to personally supervise the BAR activities. So in any case IF the BAR was to do its job and meter out an Ounce of Prevention then the Supreme Court would not have to meter out its Pound of Cure. As is often the case, when those who are initially responsible for the ounce of anything does not do their jobs, then it falls upon the supervisors to meter out their pound of solutions to make up for the failure of the first ounce to be successfully. So in this case the Mo. Supreme Court might have to expend 16 times the efforts to right the wrongs that the BAR’s ounce should have done. Mo. Supreme Court; blame the BAR, not me, or blame yourselves for not properly supervising the BAR. The “buck stops” at the Mo. Supreme Court when it comes to anything pertaining to anything with Mo. lawyers and judges! And if the BAR and the Mo. Supreme Court does nothing, like they have been doing nothing, then the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia will keep taking over America and eventually America will become radical Muslim and the U.S. Army will be fighting against Israel and Jesus Christ (Zechariah 14:1-3). It is not a good position to be in for anyone to fight against Jesus Christ.
There are professions that are expected to police their own. For example good policemen find it appalling if a bad policeman uses their uniform and badge in the commission of a crime and the bad policeman, when caught, is prosecuted and held accountable. So why don’t good lawyers/judges find it appalling when bad lawyers/judges use their positions as “Officers of the Court” to commit crimes?
The same question could be asked, why did the Catholic Church supervisor priests cover, and protect, their fellow pedophile priests when the supervisor priests had enough evidence to charge and convict the bad pedophile priests? Good question of which there is no reasonable answer. The most obvious and truthful answer would be the supervisor priests were probably just as guilty of being a pedophile as the lower priests that got caught.
It has been said, “Some pedophiles rape or molest children. There’s nothing much worse than a pedophile. There are a lot of dangerous and sick types of people in the world, but someone who sexually assaults children — a pedophile — is probably the worst of the worst.”
I have found a group of sub-humans who are even worse than a pedophile, the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia.
OMERTA AND COSA NOSTRA
“Omertà and Cosa Nostra are a Southern Italian code of silence and code of honor that places importance on silence in the face of questioning by authorities or outsiders; non-cooperation with authorities, the government, or outsiders; and willfully ignoring and generally avoiding interference with the illegal activities of others. Retaliation against informers is common in criminal circles.
“An individual who has been wronged is obligated to look out for his own interests by finding a patron [in the case of the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia another lawyer] but not the state to do the job.
“Omertà implies “the categorical prohibition of cooperation with state authorities or reliance on its services, even when one has been a victim of a crime.” A person should absolutely avoid interfering in the business of others and should not inform the authorities of a crime under any circumstances.
“Omertà is an extreme form of loyalty and solidarity in the face of authority. One of its absolute tenets is that it is deeply demeaning and shameful to betray even one’s deadliest enemy to the authorities.
“Omertà is a code of silence, referred to by its own members as Cosa Nostra (“our thing”), is an organized crime syndicate in Sicily, Italy.”
Many people have observed that when the guilty have friends in high places and there is a trial of some kind (in or out of the court room), then Justice is not tempered with mercy but is corrupted with that most dangerous of all elements, misguided loyalty. This is exactly why the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia is so dangerous to the American Public and Nation!!!
This ***OCDC CYA Letter Page is intended to illustrate to the Politician, and to the citizen who may contact their Politician, that the Mo. BAR, Office Of Chief Disciplinary Counsel’s Chief Executive must be feeling the hot seat because of this website, or why else would this letter have been mailed to me at this time, over four (4) months after any communication that I sent them?
As you read and investigate this OCDC CYA Page, and the following OCDC Pages, read between the lines for the meat of these Missouri BAR matters:
These unethical, shyster lawyer crimes that I have reported to the OCDC apparently are so common, so accepted as OK by the OCDC (wink, wink,), that these crimes do not even raise an eye brow with the OCDC, and apparently with the Mo. Supreme Court that directly supervises the OCDC, and have been alerted by me, by letter, as to what is going on!
It even gets better (or worse). The OCDC obviously knows how offensive these crimes I have reported would be to the general public so the OCDC finds itself in a position of knowingly lying about their positions on these matters, about these obvious lawyer crimes, to the point of purposely writing misleading letters like I am showing on this web page right now!!!
“CYA” is a long time policy term for government employees that stands for “cover your ass.” It means to do anything, and everything, what ever it takes, even lie, to keep your job, and the jobs of the other government employees around you that you would want to protect, even when everyone knows that the government employees have screwed up. There must be some real active talking, e-mailing, telephone conversations, or what ever other communications going on in, around, to and from the State Capital, Jefferson City, to have generated this OCDC CYA Letter at this time! This website, apowtwice, must be making a lot of government employees in Missouri very nervous and their nervousness has generated a Huge Gift to the A POW Twice Cause, Mission, and to prove the need for a
Grantor and Beneficiary, family Will and Trust, Bill of Rights.
First of all this CYA Letter is so typical of liars and thieves in government in the liar’s efforts to cover their tracks and pass the blame on to the innocent messenger. This was NOT written for me, for me to see and read, but was specifically written for any future investigators to have this delivered to them in a fraudulent effort to discredit the messenger, me, Jim Kelley. So this CYA Letter will be held in reserve, like some other things that the Unethical, Shyster Lawyer/Trustee Nancy wrote and saved in reserve for the Probate Court mock trial Judge that Nancy knew in advance, before I ever had a copy of the Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust, she would file that law suit against me, drag me into, no matter what I did short of kissing her ass, irrespective of my Throw In The Towel Letter that should have ethically stopped any court actions against me after that letter. See #83. Throw In The Towel Page.
May we go over this CYA Letter line by line for what it does say, but more importantly, what it does not say, that should have been said, if this were an honest letter.
“This is in response to your communication to this office…” This is a way to give the impression that all of this, everything associated with all of this, is Jim Kelley’s fault, trying to pass the blame on to the messenger. This is a sign of a narcissist to pass blame on to another instead of accepting blame for your own actions.
“…the previous decision by Mark Flanegin not to open an investigation file…” This is sticking together, through thick and thin, by government employees. If the 1st acting government employee was right in their actions then the 2nd government employee is OK. But if the 1st government employee was wrong, and if this stick together game does not work out well for the government employees, then the stick together game could fall apart and the whole gang of government employees could end up falling, unless a fall guy can be found or better stated, would be had, with a knife in their back.
This “not to open an investigative file” gives credible evidence, right from the horse’s mouth as the main man in charge, that there never was an investigation in the first place so how does anyone in Authority really know how serious the complaints were? If there was a sincere and open investigation and it was ruled unfounded that is one thing; but to admit there never was an investigation is a whole different matter entirely.
Then Mr Pratzel states, he has reviewed my “original complaint as well as [my] supplement submissions and [my] most recent communication to this office…” in an obvious fraudulent effort to give the impression that I have been pestering the O.C.D.C. to the point that this CYA Letter was a required and a necessary communication because of me, Jim Kelley, to get me to stop pestering them.
According to my records the last time I contacted the Mo. BAR, the O.C.D.C., would have been in my letter dated February 20, 2019, five days after Mr. Flanegin’s letter dated February 15, 2019. Reading my Febuary 20th letter, reads like a last and final letter, so why is this CYA Letter being written and sent to me on July 8, 2019, well over four (4) months, since my last communication with the Mo. BAR, the OCDC, as a response to my “most recent communication? I will copy my February 20th letter at the end of this Page.
That question can be answered by the lack of information in the CYA Letter itself. There is NO mention of the dates of my letters, including the “most recent communication.” This CYA Letter was written to give the impression that I had written recently, and to hide the fact that I had not written recently, the dates of my letters were withheld on purpose. That is how CYA in government works and liars are the ones that use these CYA tricks and tactics.
Mr. Pratzel is the Chief Disciplinary Counsel, not a deputy or an assistant, THE CHIEF COUNSEL, the top man in charge right under, directly supervised by, the Missouri Supreme court; and his decision to “agree with Mr. Flanegin’s decision not to open an investigative files…” reflects the attitude and the decisions of the Missouri Supreme Court too.
This could end up being a Missouri Government Watergate debacle if the right investigative reporters got a sniff of how nervous these Mo. BAR, O.C.D.C., Mo. Supreme Court officials seem to be. In the Nixon Watergate debacle the cover up ended up being more serious than the original crime.
I will post the actual BAR complaints for each of the named lawyers in the immediate following pages plus an inquiry about the “Judgment;” and the visitor to this website, the citizen and Politician, can make up their own minds if the O.C.D.C. should have made an honest and sincere investigation.
My February 20, 2019, letter:
[This is the last communication I had with the OCDC, so it has been right at 4 1/2 months since my “most recent communication” with the OCDC, so obviously something else has spurred the OCDC on other than my communications with them directly, just the opposite to what the OCDC letter of July 8, 2019, tries to insinuate by omitting the truth.]
February 20, 2019
Reference: O.C.D.C. review of Inquiries for Yendes, Yendes, Sherman and Bishop.
Dear Staff Council Mark A. Flanegin,
May I express my deep, and profound, disappointment that your Office has determined “that it would not be appropriate for this office to initiate action against the above referenced attorneys,” as “This office has no jurisdiction in such matters.”
I am going to be as kind, but direct, as I can possible be with my response. “The glory of God is intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth.” Your letter of February 15, 2019, is an insult to my God given intelligence and also an insult to God Himself, or, in other words, an insult to God’s light and truth.
I spent perhaps 1,000 hours preparing my Inquiries and you received them on January 17, 2019. After my two follow-up letters, dated Jan. 29 and Feb. 12, 2019, then comes your letter dated Feb. 15, 2019. It would seem by your reluctance to respond from the beginning that would strongly indicate that my Inquiries were only a burden for you with no value for holding licensed lawyers accountable according to the Missouri Rules For Professional Conduct.
When my wife read your letter her response was, how can the O.C.D.C. not have jurisdiction and why even have the Missouri Rules For Professional Conduct if they are going to be ignored? That is the way I feel too, as well as, why even have an O.C.D.C.?
It would seem your “review” of my Inquiries would represent a “white wash” of the open and notorious sins and crimes of these lawyers. May I present just one point of error (of many) on the part of your “review” and response letter?
You echo the Court Judgment as declaring “Ms. Yendes faithfully and fully performed her duties as Trustee.” May I ask how this can be true when:
#1. Ms. Yendes allowed her name to be a part of a REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT where my Dad reserved his right to change that AGREEMENT, “only with the written consent of the Trustee [Nancy Yendes].” This very well could be criminal and for sure a violation of any kind of code of ethics, and clearly represents something of great value that Nancy received from the Law Firm for referring her own father to the Law Firm.
#2. Ms. Yendes failed in her “AGREEMENT” Fiduciary Duty to bury the Grantor in a casket as instructed in the Will. Ms. Yendes’ flimsy excuse, under oath in Court, was her concern that the Cemetery would flood. The evidence bears out that excuse does not hole water (pun intended) because since the opening of the Cemetery in January, 2000, not one event of flooding. Furthermore, the evidence proves the Funeral Home refused Nancy’s Right of Sepulcher and Nancy lied to me to get my signature on the Authorization for Cremation certificate.
#3. Ms. Yendes failed in her Duty to Inform me of any existence of a Trust, when the Grantor became incapacitated, by several years during which time I was supposed to have been given a yearly accounting with a notice of my right to receive a copy of the Will and Trust.
#4. Ms. Yendes was involved in numerous lies, misrepresentations, collusions, entrapments, etc., to promote her unethical management of the Will and Trust.
#5. Nancy’s Infamous “Background” Letter, dated September 18, 2018, to you, the O.C.D.C., has eight lies packed into a one page letter, with a terroristic threat against me, proving, beyond any doubt, Ms. Yendes cannot be trusted to tell the truth, and very well may qualify as a pathological liar. If your Office were to set everything else aside, this one letter is enough to hold Ms. Yendes accountable for lying to you, and also lying to the Mo. Supreme Court, as an obvious and notorious offense against you, your Office, and the Supreme Court. If you are NOT offended by Ms. Yendes’ pack of lies directed towards you then I am offended for you!
So based on items 1-5, how can anyone in their right mind think the Court Judgment claiming “Ms. Yendes faithfully and fully performed her duties as Trustee” could possibly be fair, accurate, truthful, and honest? And you claim to have “review[ed]” all of this evidence!
May I again express my deep, and profound, disappointment that your Office has determined “that it would not be appropriate for this office to initiate action against the above referenced attorneys,” as “This office has no jurisdiction in such matters.” You clearly have jurisdiction any time a licensed lawyer violates the Missouri Rules Of Professional Conduct, and there are clearly numerous ethics violations these lawyers did and I have reported to you.
I suppose the win-fall for me is that my Inquiries, along with the lack of concern and appropriate response by the O.C.D.C., will serve as a course of solid blocks, in the solid wall of proofs, I will present to the Missouri Legislator, for the urgent need of a Grantor and Beneficiary, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, because of the open, notorious, criminal, and unethical practices of unethical Missouri licensed lawyers under your jurisdiction.
May I give thanks for your Office’s “review” of my Inquiries, and your letter of response, because your efforts are still of great value for my Mission to secure the Rights of Liberty and Justice for future Grantors and Beneficiaries connected to family Wills and Trusts.
Jim Kelley, #1 Son of Dale Kelley, a WW II, D-Day, POW, veteran, who got “shit on.”
[Any questions about my February 20, 2019, letter?]
This movie was nominated for 8 Academy Awards. Maybe there will be eight prison sentences for the lawyers in this Case? An honest person can only hope. 🙂
It is better to be right and a common person, than to be a lawyer and be wrong; especially if you have to lie and steal from the innocent to be wrong.
It may take until God’s Judgment Day before these Unethical, Shyster, Lawyers and Trustees sit on the hot seat; but then again it may be soon after the elections this year too.
No matter how this all shakes out Justice will prevail and the lies and frauds of these Unethical, Shyster, Lawyers and Trustees SHALL haunt them forever, and ever, even through out all eternity as God’s Judgment that no Dark Spirited Disciple Of Satan can escape according to the Eternal Laws Of God.
God protects little children, policemen, firemen, and American civilian soldiers too. Those who want to harm one of these the wrath of God will visit them sooner or later. They have all harmed my Dad, a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran, citizen soldier!
This website is political speech for the purpose to convince enough politicians who are in the Missouri State Legislator to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. By necessity this political speech has to be straight forward, containing the raw truth, to raise the awareness of the State Legislators for the real and desperate need of this Bill of Rights to protect the innocent Grantors and Beneficiaries from the evil designs of unethical shyster lawyers. This is a Human Rights matter and I would think it should receive bipartisan support; I pray so, I hope so.
This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.
What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.
As always if the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.