16. Nancy’s BRIBE

COMPARE THE TWO!!!

As YOU read through this BRIBE Page just ask yourself, is this NOT in direct opposition to the First Amendment and as such not a perfect example of American Nazism? This, and a hundred other examples just as outrageous as this one, are the reasons I call this American Nazism because the word “Nazi” fits perfectly!!! And then ask yourself, “What was Nazi Nancy trying to, wanting to, hide???”

What is incredibly important about Nancy’s BRIBE is the comparisons of the time line and content. Compare this BRIBE to my Throw In The Towel Letter of December 28, 2017, that was e-mailed on that date as well as sent by “snail mail,” and then two weeks later here comes Nazi Nancy’s Nazi BRIBE; and after you compare the two just try to figure out how the “Sleepy” Probate Judge came up with her SNL Courtroom, Alice’s Wonderland, Twilight Zone, “Judgement” that I was somehow responsible for keeping Nazi Nancy from winding up the Trust after my Throw In The Towel Letter?

Truth really is stranger than fiction” when it comes to the Black Robes of the false priesthoods of our American Nazi Court Systems.

This is another Chapter in the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia “Secret Combinations” Secret Society Shadow Governments (as predicted by the Ancient American Indian Scriptures).

When you read Nancy’s BRIBE you will see for yourself that Nancy tried to BRIBE me with my own Inheritance money that my Dad gave me,

IF I WOULD SIGN A DOCUMENT CONTAINING ALL MANNER OF LIES AGAINST MY DAD AND MYSELF!

As you, the visitor or politician, read this, in light of the other pages of the Truth on this website, ask yourself, “Would I have signed this pack of lies just so I could get my own Inheritance, that belonged to me anyway?” Why would I sign something that was the same as a Pack of Lies that would extend to my shitting on my own Dad, stabbing my own Dad in the back, just to get some money which was my money anyway? And with an all encompassing Gag Order like this one any person has to ask, what else is Nazi Nancy Yendes afraid of, that I might discover that she knows about, that is out there to be discovered and/or figured out?

Also, is it not plain to see Trustee Nancy was prepared to pay the “legal fees” out of the Trust funds if she got this Gag Order signed by what is similar to a “rubber hose confession” signed by me if she could trick me somehow into signing that.

Is this not similar to my Dad being tricked into signing his Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust? But then my Dad was 94 years old and virtually blind, where I could see what Trustee Nancy wanted to trick me into signing.

NOTE: I do not think this was filed in the Court because I never signed this however, it may be among the 200, throw a lot of mud on the wall to see if something sticks, exhibits that these lawyers presented in the Court Case in an obvious jester to prove since they had nothing of substance, overwhelm the opposition with a boat load of “BS,” because they do not have the truth on your side.

Here is what Trustee Nancy had presented to me, through the Shyster Lawyer Paul Sherman, on Jan. 12, 2018, wanted me to sign, and you be the judge if you think this is a BRIBE, or perhaps this even rises to the level of extortion:

 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GREENE COUNTY

PROBATE DIVISION

In Re: Dale Edgar Kelley Revocable                                   )

Living Trust Dated August 31, 2011,                                  )

By its Trustee, Nancy K. Yendes,                                       )

Plaintiff                                                                                         )

)                      Case No. 1731-PR01048                                                                                          vs.                                                      )

)

Maureen Royce, et al.,                                                          )

Defendants.                                         )       [For some reason the half moons will not stay in place when I update.]

AGREEMENT TO CONSENT TO JUDGMENT REGARDING THE SHARE,

ALLEGATIONS, CLAIMS AND ASSERTIONS OF BENEFICIARY

JAMES W. KELLEY

COMES NOW, JAMES W. KELLEY, Beneficiary, and hereby consents and agrees and

authorizes the Court to enter Judgment as prayed and truly shown in the Petition for Declaratory

Judgment, more particularly set forth as follows:

The Court is hereby requested by Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY to enter judgment

against Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY on all of his claims, allegations and assertions as to

actions of the Trustee, the Attorneys serving the Trust, the family members, and third parties, his

objections to the Plan of Final Distribution, the Final Accounting and Discharge of the Trustee,

and further finding that his allegations and claims are not, and cannot be, supported by evidence

or facts, that his legal assertions are not supported in law or fact, and that his claims, allegations

and objections are therefore without any merit. Further, by his signature hereto he also agrees to

the Court granting the Protective Order and entering its Order sealing the pleadings and exhibits

on file herein, ordering elevated security on Case.Net and that future access to this Case and its

file be limited to parties only, and even then not for dissemination, but to prohibit discussing the

matters and allegations contained in the sealed documents filed in this case except by Court

Order. In addition, Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY admits to his harassing conduct herein and

does not seek judicial intervention and guidance or to conduct a full evidentiary hearing thereon,

so that he requests this Court not to assess attorneys’ fees and costs against his share but that

such fees and costs shall be treated as expenses of the Trust Estate and paid prior to any

distribution of the remaining assets.

Further, Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY hereby apologizes to the Court and every

person he has written about or to since March 18, 2017, regarding this Trust, the Will and the

treatment of DALE E. KELLEY while he was alive and upon his death.

Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY admits and agrees that he is entitled only to one-third of

all assets after expenses under the language of the Trust.

Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY admits and agrees that he is entitled only to one-third of

all assets after expenses under the language of the Trust.

Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY admits and agrees that the POW Journal should be

placed in the same museum with the remainder of the Dale E. Kelley WWII Memorabilia, that

Nancy K. Yendes as Trustee had and did choose such Museum, and that he will not take any

actions or engage in any conduct to interfere with the museum, including any attempt to remove

any item of the collection from the museum’s ownership and care.

Further, Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY understands and acknowledges that in return

for this Consent, the Trustee NANCY Yendes will forego her right to seek attorney fees and

costs against him based on his admissions contained herein and his promise that he will cease

making his false assertions of facts, claims of illegal conduct regarding all parties hereto, their

families, relations, the Trust Attorneys, the members and employees of the law firm representing

the Trust, any churches such persons are associated with or members of, the witnesses to the

Will and Trust, and third parties in any forum or through any medium including to any

employers, future past and present, or the media.

Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY hereby consents under oath to the Court entering

Judgment as described herein against him on all factual and legal claims and agrees, overruling

his objections, and unequivocally states the purposed distribution upon termination by the

Trustee is valid and reasonable and that the Court should Order same as final to conclude the

Trust, Release the Trustee and allow final discharge of the Trustee.

WHEREFORE, Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY prays this Court enter judgment against

Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY on his objections and in favor of the TRUSTEE as follows:

  1. All of the claims of Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY are hereby found to be without

merit, frivolous and totally without support in any facts, evidence or law and

therefore are ruled against Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY, except his right to his

one-third (1/3) share as beneficiary;

  1. The objections raised by Defendant JAMES W. KELLEY to the Plan of Final

Distribution, the Final Accounting and Discharge of the Trustee, are overruled;

  1. That the Final Plan of Distribution and Accounting are found reasonable and hereby

approved for distribution in three (3) equal parts to the three (3) remaining

beneficiaries, NANCY YENDES, MAUREEN ROYCE and JAMES W. KELLEY;

  1. That the Trustee shall be released and discharged from all duties, responsibilities and

liabilities upon distribution in equal one-third shares of all remaining assets of the

Trust to the three beneficiaries identified in the Petition and as shown on the Exhibit

thereto, except for the filing of the 2017 and 2018 tax returns and tax payments due as

shown on such returns; and

  1. That the Attorneys’ fees and costs of the Trust for this action and representation of

the Trustee are approved and shall be paid out of the Trust Assets prior to final any

distribution;

  1. That the file in this cause with the exception of the Court’s final Order and this

Agreement for a Consent Judgment shall be sealed, the pleadings of Defendant

JAMES W. KELLEY stricken as containing false and bad faith claims and assertions,

and that Case.Net shall have an elevated security level until this Court orders

otherwise;

  1. That the parties hereto shall not discuss the documents and allegations sealed by said

Order in the future without an Order of a Court requiring them to do so after any

notice that may be provided by law to the other parties hereto of any intent to so

discuss; and

  1. For such further relief as the Court shall deem appropriate in the premises.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________

James W. Kelley, Beneficiary-Defendant

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT UNDER OATH BY JAMES W. KELLEY

COUNTY OF ______                   )

)

STATE OF MISSOURI                  )

On this _______day of January, 2018, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,

personally appeared JAMES W. KELLEY, to me known to be the person who executed the

foregoing AGREEMENT TO CONSENT TO JUDGMENT REGARDING THE SHARE,

ALLEGATIONS, CLAIMS AND ASSERTIONS OF BENEFICIARY JAMES W.

KELLEY that the facts stated in the foregoing AGREEMENT are true, and he further

acknowledged that he executed the said as his free act and deed.

In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal in my

office in said County and State the day and year next above written.

My term of office as a Notary Public will expire:

 

_____________________________

Notary Public

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on January _____, 2018, the foregoing document

was filed with the Clerk of the Court in open Court and by mail upon the following parties:

Paul F. Sherman,  Attorney for the Trustee

XXXX XXXX  XXXXXX

Springfield MO 65801-1072

Janice Stockham

XXXX X XX XXX

Springfield MO 65803

James W. Kelley

1063 E. 368th Rd.

Bolivar MO 65613

Maureen Royce

XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX

Katy TX 77450

———————————————————————–

Question to anyone: Would you have signed this “rubber hose confession?”

Comments: Had I signed this BRIBE, which is more like EXTORTION, I would not be able to have this website and exercise the 1st Amendment Rights to petition the government for a redress of grievances of the current unethical and abusive Probate Laws and the Selfish, Malicious, Predator, Blood Sucker, Bottom Feeder, Shyster, American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia that is the engine for the use of the unethical and abusive Probate Laws.

This came to me two weeks after my Throw In The Towel Letter (see #18, Throw In Towel page) so go and figure for yourself. Apparently to show any weakness in front of, or towards, the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia is like when sharks smell blood and go on a feeding frenzy against the wounded animal. The reality is that after my Throw In The Towel Letter (12-28-2017) that should have stopped the two Court Hearings and two Depositions that were all scheduled afterwards, that is if these Lawyers and Trustees were fair and honest. I still wonder why the Judge did not pick up on that after my Throw In The Towel Letter anything afterwards was a clear and malicious abuse against me and that is a question that I included in my Inquiries to the Mo. BAR, Office Of Chief Disciplinary Council, page #14 on this website. No answer from them and there probably will never be an answer from the O.C.D.C. unless someone with some Authority holds them accountable someday.

Also go to the MO BAR page #15, and read Trustee Nancy’s Infamous Background Letter, especially lie #8, where she states, “We have done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide.” Question: If these Lawyers and Trustees don’t have anything to hide then why try to get the Court Records sealed so no one can access them and why this BRIBE Gag Order attempt? Good question! Does the Lawyers and Trustees have a good answer? If they do, and submit it to me in a short form, I will include it right HERE!

There you have it, the evidence, the proof, just how unethical and controlling these obviously narcissistic Lawyers and Trustees are. Anyone disagree?

Bro. Jim

 

————————————————————–

This website is political speech for the purpose to convince enough politicians who are in the Missouri State Legislator to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. By necessity this political speech has to be straight forward, containing the raw truth, to raise the awareness of the State Legislators for the real and desperate need of this Bill of Rights to protect the innocent Grantors and Beneficiaries from the evil designs of unethical shyster lawyers. This is a Human Rights matter and I would think it should receive bipartisan support; I pray so, I hope so.

This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.

What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious  self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.

As always if the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.