This is another Chapter in the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia “Secret Combinations” Secret Society Shadow Governments (as predicted by the Ancient American Indian Scriptures).
PROBING QUESTION: If most of the Missouri lawyers and judges indirectly, the Mo. BAR including the O.C.D.C. directly, and the Mo Supreme Court as direct supervisors of the BAR, don’t/can’t honor, sustain, and enforce the lawyer codes of ethics which is named the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct; then how in the world can they honor, sustain, and enforce the laws of the land? ANSWER; They can’t, don’t, and won’t! This is the basis for the Missouri Court Systems law and order breakdowns.
So as anyone can see, most of the Missouri “licensed” lawyers and judges of the Missouri BAR, the Missouri BAR including the O.C.D.C., along with the Missouri Supreme Court, doesn’t think that the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct are worth the paper they are printed on. Likewise all of these lawyers and judges collectively would not think that the laws of the land are worth the paper they are written on unless the lawyers and judges can use something in the law to their personal advantage. Any wonder why/how the Dale Kelley Will and Trust was not worth the paper it was written on, except those items, often taken out of context, that the lawyers and judges could use to their advantage, at least in their weak and puerile minds.
Fighting Against Jesus!!!
One of the main problems in American governments today is we neither have an Ounce of Prevention OR a Pound of Cure when it comes to wide spread and open government corruptions. After siting dozens of notorious and publicly exposed police department corruptions across America the author states:
“Incidents like these are only a sampling of the extent of police corruptions across the country. But large or small, they have one thing in common. The ordinary police officer, however honest, looked the other way, or got out [of the department], or once in a great while anonymously reported a specific payoff. In none of them was there a cop willing to blow the whistle on his own [the Blue Code of Silence], and then step forward, as would be expected in any other criminal proceeding, and testify openly in court. In none of them was there a Frank Serpico.” Page 140, SERPICO, by Peter Maas, 23rd printing August 1976, copyright 1973.
What the visitor will witness in these seven OCDC BAR Cover-up pages is nothing less than what had gone on in the police departments that so outraged the Public, the People, Society, to the extent that a book like Serpice had 23 printings in four years. My copy is a 23rd printing and I am unable to find how many printings there are after that.
I suppose that I, Jim Kelley, would be comparable to Frank Serpico when it comes to my willingness to stand up against the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia of today. It would seem no one else has the guts to really join me with the one public servant exception of the Honorable Josh Hawley, former Missouri A.G. and current U.S. Senator, and a hand full of people who gave their names on gofundme.
The state BARs should be the Ounce of Prevention for lawyer and judge corruptions. And if the BAR doesn’t do their job then it falls on the Missouri Supreme Court to meter out the Pound of Cure because they have the direct responsibility to personally supervise the BAR activities. So in any case IF the BAR was to do its job and meter out an Ounce of Prevention then the Supreme Court would not have to meter out its Pound of Cure. As is often the case, when those who are initially responsible for the ounce of anything does not do their jobs, then it falls upon the supervisors to meter out their pound of solutions to make up for the failure of the first ounce to be successfully. So in this case the Mo. Supreme Court might have to expend 16 times the efforts to right the wrongs that the BAR’s ounce should have done. Mo. Supreme Court; blame the BAR, not me, or blame yourselves for not properly supervising the BAR. The “buck stops” at the Mo. Supreme Court when it comes to anything pertaining to anything with Mo. lawyers and judges! And if the BAR and the Mo. Supreme Court does nothing, like they have been doing nothing, then the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia will keep taking over America and eventually America will become radical Muslim and the U.S. Army will be fighting against Israel and Jesus Christ (Zechariah 14:1-3). It is not a good position to be in for anyone to fight against Jesus Christ.
OMERTA AND COSA NOSTRA
“Omertà and Cosa Nostra are a Southern Italian code of silence and code of honor that places importance on silence in the face of questioning by authorities or outsiders; non-cooperation with authorities, the government, or outsiders; and willfully ignoring and generally avoiding interference with the illegal activities of others. Retaliation against informers is common in criminal circles.
“An individual who has been wronged is obligated to look out for his own interests by finding a patron [in the case of the American Nazi Lawyer/Judge Mafia another lawyer] but not the state to do the job.
“Omertà implies “the categorical prohibition of cooperation with state authorities or reliance on its services, even when one has been a victim of a crime.” A person should absolutely avoid interfering in the business of others and should not inform the authorities of a crime under any circumstances.
“Omertà is an extreme form of loyalty and solidarity in the face of authority. One of its absolute tenets is that it is deeply demeaning and shameful to betray even one’s deadliest enemy to the authorities.
“Omertà is a code of silence, referred to by its own members as Cosa Nostra (“our thing”), is an organized crime syndicate in Sicily, Italy.”
Many people have observed that when the guilty have friends in high places and there is a trial of some kind (in or out of the court room), then Justice is not tempered with mercy but is corrupted with that most dangerous of all elements, misguided loyalty.
This ***OCDC Carl Page is intended to illustrate to the Politician, and the citizen who may contact their Politician, that even when a gang of these Criminally Insane, Double-Crossing, No Class, No Dignity, Ungrateful, Perpetual Complainer, Pathological Liar, Kleptomaniac, Narcissist, Control Freak, Selfish, Malicious, Nefarious Predator, Blood Sucker, Bottom Feeder, Cold Blooded, Parasite, Unethical Shyster Lawyers, Mental Nut-Jobs, associated with “a den of thieves” Law Firm (The English language is incapable of adequately describing these low lifes but God will have the words, in God’s language, to adequately describe them, and every soul will know just what low lifes they were.), operate out in the open as if an infamous criminal gang, the Mo. BAR, the O.C.D.C., and apparently the Mo. Supreme Court (based on their direct supervision of the O.C.D.C. and the Judges silence in this matter) couldn’t care less about Missouri Lawyers adhering to the Missouri Rules Of Professional Conduct (Code Of Ethics for Mo. lawyers).
Several times during the infamous Deposition, Contingent Trustee/Shyster Lawyer Carl Yendes looked like the cat that just ate the canary when he thought that he got me somehow; but there were times he got himself caught up in his own trap, and looked like a stooge with a question mark on his chest, a questioning look on his face. So I will illustrate Carl with Sylvester and also the questioning look Carl had on his face when he got caught in his own trap as a question mark stooge, 1/2 wit.
For what it is worth, here is a copy of the Inquiry that the Chief Disciplinary Counsel ignored as irrelevant:
January 9, 2019
Subject: Inquiries to determine if Carl Yendes’ conduct as a licensed lawyer, acting as a licensed defense lawyer, acting in the capacity of a Contingent Trustee, and in some acts in private capacity, rises to the level of serious professional misconduct according to the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct.
Reference: Dale E. Kelley Will and Trust, Green County Probate Court Case No. 1731-PRO1048
Lawyer: Carl Yendes, BAR # 29782, 1617 W. LaSalle, Springfield, Mo. 65807, currently working for the City of Springfield, as the head Municipal Court Prosecuting Attorney.
To: the Honorable Mo. BAR, O.C.D.C., and the Honorable Missouri Supreme Court,
Most respectful greetings,
First thing may I incorporate the Nancy Yendes Inquiries (including all enclosures), by reference, as though set out verbatim in this Inquiry for Carl Yendes, for the foundation of evidence that would directly, or indirectly, apply to this Carl Yendes Inquiry.
May I present that Carl Yendes is as guilty of misconduct as Nancy Yendes would be for the following reasons:
#1. As Nancy Yendes’ husband, and as the Contingent Trustee of the Dale Kelley Will and Trust, Carl was Nancy’s Shadow for much of the misconduct of Nancy Yendes, so Carl Yendes was personally involved, often was hands on, or saw enough close up of Nancy Yendes’ misconduct, that Carl knew, or should have known what was going on, so he had an ethical Duty and Obligation to stop any, and all, unethical conduct and ethics violations that he knew about.
#2. Nancy Yendes’ written comments and statements give testimony that Carl Yendes was present, and personally involved, in the “capture” of my Dad; in the moving of my Dad to Springfield; had his own copies of the Will and Trust; and was personally involved (hands on) with the Screw You Father, Revenge Cremation Insult.
#3. During the two Depositions, and the April 4th Court Hearing, Carl Yendes was a paid lawyer representative for Nancy Yendes, vigorously defending all that Nancy had done that is outlined in the Nancy Yendes Inquiry, so it is obvious Carl Yendes personally supported at the time of, then vigorously defended later, and now again supports/defends, all that Nancy Yendes did that was unethical, which would be listed in the Nancy Yendes Inquiry, making Carl Yendes just as guilty as Nancy Yendes by his actual physical participation, vigorous defense, and/or implied consent to support Nancy Yendes in all of her unethical actions and activities.
#4. As a Contingent Trustee, and Nancy’s Shadow, with just as much skin in the law suit as Nancy Yendes, Carl Yendes had an ethical Duty and Obligation to recuse himself from being a defense lawyer for Nancy Yendes, or anyone else associated with the Dale Kelley Will and Trust Case. Since Carl Yendes did not recuse himself as a defense lawyer for Nancy Yendes we now have irrefutable evidence that Carl Yendes was 100% behind Nancy Yendes’ violations of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct by his vigorous defense of Nancy Yendes, when he had personal knowledge that Nancy was wrong, and as a 100% accomplice that included the extreme and vigorous defense of Nancy Yendes, therefore, Carl Yendes is just as guilty because of his personal knowledge of the unethical conduct of Nancy Yendes on all counts and he vigorously defended that which he had personal knowledge was unethical.
#5. Carl Yendes’ failure to recuse himself is a textbook example of a person who was a direct participant in the allegations against Nancy Yendes, as Nancy Yendes’ Shadow; Carl Yendes was subject to being called as a participating witness, testifying against, for and in behalf of his own self, and would have been more inclined to use unethical process in the Court Hearings because it was his skin that was in the game, just as much as Nancy Yendes’ skin was. In fact Carl Yendes did participate in what he knew, or should have known, were lies, misrepresentations, fraud, entrapments, and perjury to achieve an unethical victory over a poor person that Carl knew could not afford to hire their own lawyer.
#6. Carl Yendes is the one who went against the advice of the Judge when asking that the Court assess all of the legal fees against Jim Kelley; knowing himself that the law suit was initiated by Nancy Yendes and all Depositions and Court Hearing could have been avoided after the Throw In The Towel Letter by Jim Kelley. Carl Yendes had, and still displays personal knowledge of the Throw In The Towel Letter, but acts as if no such letter ever existed, clearly demonstrating that to Carl, the truth does not matter, especially if denial of the truth can help save his own skin.
#7. Carl Yendes committed many frauds and misrepresentations by himself and may I give just one as a textbook illustration to just how unethical Carl Yendes was, is, and can still be!
During the 4 hour Deposition on March 16, 2018, Carl Yendes presented to me that my Dad had signed a Real Estate Contract to sell his house so is this not proof positive that my Dad intended to move to Springfield? My answer to that was that on the surface one might think that but, in that Contract my Dad had a Life Estate Reservation that he was to live there until he died, giving proof that my Dad intended to live in that house until he died.
This obviously intended fraud by misrepresentation by Carl Yendes even gets better, Carl sinking in the quick sand of his own lies and deception, when it is known that Carl Yendes is the lawyer who wrote that Real Estate Contract and Carl had conversations with my Dad where my Dad told Carl Yendes that he wanted to live in his house until the day that he died and that is exactly why that Life Estate Reservation was included in that Contract and Carl is the one who wrote it, and included it, in the Contract!!! Oh how I wish that Deposition would have been video recorded to catch the “deer caught in the headlights” stare on Carl’s face at that moment. “Priceless!”
There were other “deer caught in the headlights” moments for Carl during that Deposition but this one should be enough to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that Carl has no moral compass and is capable of any kind of a fraud and this is one, of many, is reason enough that Carl should have recused himself from being a lawyer representative for Nancy Yendes during a Deposition or Court Hearing that Carl had as much skin in the game and could very well have been called as a witness against himself.
With all that has been presented in the Nancy Yendes Inquiries which Carl Yendes would be a direct, or indirect, party to and the obvious fraud Carl Yendes tried to pull on me in the Deposition with the Real Estate Contract, is there any doubt that Carl Yendes is just as guilty as Nancy Yendes on all counts, and deserves the same kind of punishment as Nancy Yendes does?
For these same reasons that Carl Yendes is just a guilty as Nancy Yendes on all counts, Carl Yendes should have recused himself from being any kind of defense lawyer for Nancy Yendes, or the Will and Trust that Carl Yendes personally violated and became an “opponent” to the Grantor; Carl Yendes’ personal motivations tainted his ability to ethically represent anyone in this Dale Kelley Will and Trust law suit case, and therefore his lawyer representation actions would be null and void as tainted with his personal motivations. So the “legal fees” originating from Carl Yendes’ personal representations before the Bench would be ill-gotten gains and uncollectable because Carl Yendes gave his personal petition to the Court that the Court assign the legal fees to the Beneficiary Jim Kelley.
Carl Yendes should have recused himself, and had he recused himself he would not have stood before the Judge to ask for the Judge to assign the “legal fees” to myself, Jim Kelley, and therefore that request would not have been made, making that request null and void.
No doubt the Trustee Nancy would argue that if Carl was not there then another lawyer would have petitioned the Court to assign the “legal fees” to Jim Kelley. Maybe not so because anther lawyer may not have been so ethically challenged to petition the Court for that unethical petition, and remember, the Honorable Judge asked Carl, “Are you sure you want to do this?”
Another reason Carl Yendes should have recused himself is he has apparently had a personal vendetta against myself, Jim Kelley, as the Black Sheep of the family, and I will give some proof of that. I will include an e-mail exchange between Carl and myself recently where Carl mocks me for living in a “converted hog barn” for my house because I am a poor person living in the Ozark countryside.
I think it is pretty obvious that Carl Yendes was a willing participant in all of the Elder Abuses against my Dad, and now me, and deserves the fullest extent of discipline warranted by the MROPC.
Jim Kelley, 1063 E. 368th Road, Bolivar, MO 65613, firstname.lastname@example.org
Closures: Nancy Yendes Inquiry File, Carl Yendes’ ENTRY OF APPEARANCY [for] Nancy, and Carl Yendes’ infamous mocking of myself e-mail.
Anyone else besides me think that the OCDC should have at least made an investigation?
Anyone else besides me asking themselves, why have an OCDC if they do not investigate Inquiries/Complaints pertaining to the Code Of Ethics?
No doubt the answers to these questions would be that Satanic, Nazi, Socialist, Communist, parties, organizations, and governments do NOT investigate corruptions and pollutions within themselves and any stinking Missouri Rules Of Professional Conduct are as worthless as my Dad’s Satanic, Nazi, Unconditional Surrender Will and Trust, the Satanic, Nazi, Probate Court Judgment, just exactly like the Satanic, Nazi, German Hitler’s Government leading up to WW II.
This is “the land of the free and the home of the brave;” but we as a People, we as a Nation;
have to be brave enough to live free.
Brave like Christian Soldiers marching as to war, and stand up for everyone’s Rights, because everyone’s Rights are Your Rights!
This website is political speech for the purpose to convince enough politicians who are in the Missouri State Legislator to pass a Grantor’s and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights. By necessity this political speech has to be straight forward, containing the raw truth, to raise the awareness of the State Legislators for the real and desperate need of this Bill of Rights to protect the innocent Grantors and Beneficiaries from the evil designs of unethical shyster lawyers. This is a Human Rights matter and I would think it should receive bipartisan support; I pray so, I hope so.
This website represents “a never ending battle for Truth, Justice and the American Way” which concepts it seems most lawyers are trying to take/steal away. Like all evil, if you give evil an inch, then evil will take a mile. It seems most lawyers think “the arm of flesh” knows better than God what Truth and Justice are as the Lawyer Profession blunders down the black hole of evil and sin, while trying to suck America with them to a hell on earth. Just say NO to evil, STOP evil, say NO to corrupt lawyers, STOP corrupt lawyers, for a better America today for ourselves and tomorrow for our posterity.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This whole Page, and this whole Website, has to be considered “legally” to be my own OPINION, and nothing else, because there are four Lawyers, and a Law Firm, poised, waiting, to pounce on me and this Website. The Law Firm petitioned The Court to order this Website taken down; first time January 17, 2018, and a second time, April 4, 2018. Obviously this Website is in jeopardy for telling the Truth about a WW II, D-Day, captured behind enemy lines, POW for 10 months, veteran; Elder Abused by a team of unethical lawyers, and a Law Firm, the PROOF preserved in the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER WILL AND TRUST, that led to this Veteran being held as a POW in the 21st Century War of Elder Abuses, and they are obviously afraid of that.
What is my opinion today, will no doubt become the opinions of millions of other Americans soon, and perhaps will evolve into obvious self-evident truth for the future. To get to an obvious self-evident Set of Truths pertaining to a Grantor’s, and Beneficiary’s, Will and Trust, Bill of Rights, it is going to take the efforts of millions of Americans, that can legitimately claim the Title of Americans, to come together and say “STOP!” to the lawyer abuses so prevalent pertaining to Probate Laws that would go against the ideals of all Americans, especially American Veterans like my Dad, in unified efforts to stomp out the symptoms of Socialism in the Probate Laws.
As always if the Trustees, lawyers, and Law Firm would like to give me any short statement to explain their side/opinion I would probably include that if they would wish. They all have declined to my honest and sincere offers like this in the past.